ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2023
Associations of Menstrual Cycle Regularity and Length With Cardiovascular Diseases: A Prospective Study From UK Biobank.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association of psychosocial factors at work with fertility and menstrual disorders: A systematic review.Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS · 2025Pooled it
- Endometriosis, subclinical cardiac remodeling, and cardiovascular risk: mechanistic insights from cardiac magnetic resonance and mediation analysis.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Article
- Associations between self-reported personal care products use and menstrual cycle length and regularity in a US digital cohort.Environment international · 2026Article
- A Review of Traditional and Non-Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Women.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
- Tailoring cardiovascular risk prediction to females.The Journal of endocrinology · 2025Review
- The Menstrual Cycle as a Vital Sign: a comprehensive review.F&S reviews · 2025Article
- Menstruation-Related Angina-The Wee Hours.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2024Review
- Time to cycle regularity and health risks.Current opinion in endocrinology, diabetes, and obesity · 2024Review
- Association of heavy menstrual bleeding with cardiovascular disease in US female hospitalizations.BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Promoting Healthy Longevity Should Start Young: A Life Course Journey.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2024Article
- Effects of menstrual disorders and dysmenorrhea on cardiovascular disease: a Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The association between menstrual cycle characteristics and cardiovascular outcomes remains unclear. This study was undertaken to evaluate whether menstrual cycle regularity and length throughout the life course are associated with cardiovascular outcomes. Methods and Results This cohort study included 58 056 women who had no cardiovascular disease (CVD) at baseline and reported their menstrual cycle regularity and length. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for CVD events were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. During the median 11.8 years of follow-up, 1623 incident CVD cases were documented, including 827 incident cases of coronary heart disease, 199 myocardial infarctions, 271 strokes, 174 cases of heart failure, and 393 cases of atrial fibrillations. Compared with women with regular menstrual cycles, the HRs for women with irregular menstrual cycles were 1.19 (95% CI, 1.07-1.31) for CVD events and 1.40 (95% CI, 1.14-1.72) for atrial fibrillation. The multivariable-adjusted HRs for short (≤21 days) or long (35 days) menstrual cycles during follow-up were 1.29 (95% CI, 1.11-1.50) and 1.11 (95% CI, 0.98-1.56) for CVD events, respectively. Similarly, long or short cycle length were more likely to be associated with increased risk of atrial fibrillation (HR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.01-1.66]; and HR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.02-1.87]), and short cycle length was more likely to be associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease and myocardial infarction. However, these associations for stroke and heart failure were not significant. Conclusions Long or short menstrual cycle length was associated with increased risks of CVD and atrial fibrillation but not myocardial infarction, heart failure, or stroke. Short cycle length was associated with a greater risk of coronary heart disease and myocardial infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.