Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37222105›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2023

The impact of strict lockdowns on the mental health and well-being of people living in Australia during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Anita M Y Goh, Christa Dang, Rushani Wijesuriya, Karen E Lamb, Maya G Panisset, Pragya Gartoulla, Esther Tan, Frances Batchelor, Bianca Brijnath, Briony Dow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. When Gig Work Gets Ruff: The Affective Benefits of Daily Human-Animal Interactions for Mental Health.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anita M Y GohFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia; and Aged Care Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0159-5926
Christa DangClinical Gerontology Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Rushani WijesuriyaMethods and Implementation Support for Clinical and Health Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia; and Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Karen E LambMethods and Implementation Support for Clinical and Health Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia; and Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Maya G PanissetFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia; and Clinical Gerontology Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Pragya GartoullaSocial Gerontology Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Esther TanAged Care Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0296-4260
Frances BatchelorFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia; and Clinical Gerontology Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Bianca BrijnathSocial Gerontology Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Australia; and School of Social Sciences, University of Western Australia, Australia.
Briony DowFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia; and Director, National Ageing Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
National Ageing Research Institute · AUMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are limited longitudinal studies on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and well-being, including the effects of imposed restrictions and lockdowns.

aimsThis study investigates how living in a pandemic, and related lockdowns and restrictions, affected the mental health of people living in Australia during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodA total of 875 people living in Australia participated in a longitudinal survey from 27 May to 14 December 2020. This time period includes dates that span pre-, during and post-wave 2 lockdowns in Australia, with strict and sustained public health measures. Linear mixed models were fitted to investigate the effect of lockdown on depression and anxiety symptoms.

resultsSymptoms of depression and anxiety improved over time, during and after lockdowns. More adverse mental health symptoms were observed for people with a history of medical or mental health problems, caring responsibilities, more neurotic personality traits or less conscientiousness, and for people who were younger. People who reported being more conscientious reported better mental health.

conclusionsDespite notoriously strict lockdowns, participants did not experience a deterioration of mental health over time. Results suggest a lack of significant adverse effects of lockdown restrictions on mental health and well-being. Findings highlight cohorts that could benefit from targeted mental health support and interventions, so that public policy can be better equipped to support them, particularly if future strict public health measures such as lockdowns are being considered or implemented for the COVID-19 pandemic and other disasters.

Indexed as

anxietyCOVID-19depressiondisastermental health

Identifiers

PMID37222105
PMCPMC10228230
OpenAlexW4377939908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.