Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37222009›Full record

Observational studyJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2023

Patient-reported ability to walk 4 m and to wash: New clinical endpoints and predictors of survival in patients with pre-terminal cancer.

Markus S Anker, Alessia Lena, Eric J Roeland, Jan Porthun, Sebastian Schmitz, Sara Hadzibegovic, Philipp Sikorski, Ursula Wilkenshoff, Ann-Kathrin Fröhlich, Luisa Valentina Ramer and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Markus S AnkerDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine CBF, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4406-8555
Alessia LenaDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine CBF, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Eric J RoelandKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Jan PorthunCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sebastian SchmitzCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sara HadzibegovicDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine CBF, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Philipp SikorskiCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ursula WilkenshoffCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ann-Kathrin FröhlichDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine CBF, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Luisa Valentina RamerCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias RoseDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jan EuckerDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Benjamin-Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
Tienush RassafDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Matthias TotzeckDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Lorenz H LehmannDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, and Pneumology, Cardio-Oncology Unit, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stephan von HaehlingDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medicine Goettingen (UMG), Goettingen, Germany.
Andrew J S CoatsHeart Research Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Tim FriedeGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5347-7441
Javed ButlerBaylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Stefan D AnkerCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Hanno RiessDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus CCM, Berlin, Germany.
Ulf LandmesserDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine CBF, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Lars BullingerDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ulrich KellerDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Johann AhnDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DENorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOGerman Cancer Research Center · DEWest German Heart and Vascular Center Essen · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DENephrologisches Zentrum Goettingen · DEOregon Health & Science University · USThe Heart Research Institute · AUUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity of Mississippi · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaintaining the ability to perform self-care is a critical goal in patients with cancer. We assessed whether the patient-reported ability to walk 4 m and wash oneself predict survival in patients with pre-terminal cancer.

methodsWe performed a prospective observational study on 169 consecutive hospitalized patients with cancer (52% female, 64 ± 12 years) and an estimated 1-12 months prognosis at an academic, inpatient palliative care unit. Patients answered functional questions for 'today', 'last week', and 'last month', performed patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and physical function assessments.

resultsNinety-two (54%) patients reported the ability to independently walk 4 m and 100 (59%) to wash 'today'. The median number of days patients reported the ability to walk 4 m and wash were 6 (IQR 0-7) and 7 (0-7) days ('last week'); and 27 (5-30) and 26 (10-30) days ('last month'). In the last week, 32% of patients were unable to walk 4 m on every day and 10% could walk on 1-3 days; 30% were unable to wash on every day and 10% could wash on 1-3 days. In the last months, 14% of patients were unable to walk 4 m on every day and 10% could only walk on 1-10 days; 12% were unable to wash on every day and 11% could wash on 1-10 days. In patients who could walk 'today' average 4 m gait speed was 0.78 ± 0.28 m/s. Patients who reported impaired walking and washing experienced more symptoms (dyspnoea, exertion, and oedema) and decreased physical function (higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, and lower Karnofsky Performance Status and hand-grip strength [unable vs. able to walk 'today': 205 ± 87 vs. 252 ± 78 Newton, P = 0.001; unable vs. able to wash 'today': 204 ± 86 vs. 250 ± 80 Newton, P = 0.001]). During the 27 months of observation, 152 (90%) patients died (median survival 46 days). In multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, all tested parameters were independent predictors of survival: walking 4 m 'today' (HR 0.63, P = 0.015), 'last week' (per 1 day: HR 0.93, P = 0.011), 'last month' (per 1 day: HR 0.98, P = 0.012), 4 m gait speed (per 1 m/s: HR 0.45, P = 0.002), and washing 'today' (HR 0.67, P = 0.024), 'last week (per 1 day HR 0.94, p=0.019), and 'last month' (per 1 day HR 0.99, P = 0.040). Patients unable to walk and wash experienced the shortest survival and most reduced functional status.

conclusionsIn patients with pre-terminal cancer, the self-reported ability to walk 4 m and wash were independent predictors of survival and associated with decreased functional status.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsWalkingFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleProspective StudiesRegression AnalysisWalking SpeedCancerIndependencePalliative careSelf-careWalking abilityWashing ability

Identifiers

PMID37222009
PMCPMC10401535
OpenAlexW4377940399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.