Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37221941›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the International AIDS Society2023

Factors associated with mobile app-based ordering of HIV self-test kits among men who have sex with men in Atlanta, Detroit and New York City: an exploratory secondary analysis of a randomized control trial.

Noah Mancuso, Gordon Mansergh, Rob Stephenson, Keith J Horvath, Sabina Hirshfield, Jose A Bauermeister, Mary Ann Chiasson, Martin J Downing, Patrick S Sullivan

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Reach and effectiveness outcomes of the "I'm Ready" HIV self-testing program in Black communities in Canada.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Noah MancusoDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4442-9293
Gordon ManserghDivision of HIV Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3202-9081
Rob StephensonDepartment of Systems, Populations and Leadership, School of Nursing and The Center for Sexuality and Health Disparities, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9239-2640
Keith J HorvathDepartment of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.
Sabina HirshfieldSTAR Program, Department of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
Jose A BauermeisterDepartment of Family and Community Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mary Ann ChiassonDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health and Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Martin J DowningDepartment of Psychology, Lehman College, CUNY, Bronx, New York, USA.
Patrick S SullivanDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7728-0587
Emory University · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USLehman College · USSan Diego State University · USSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Virology and Molecular Biomarkers CoreP30AI050409 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Ann M Chahroudi, Colleen F Kelley · 2002 to 2026
$74.0M
Mobile Messaging Intervention to Present New HIV Prevention Options for MSMU01PS004977 · PS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SULLIVAN, PATRICK SEAN · 2015 to 2018
$3.8M
NCHHSTP CDC HHS U01 PS004977NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention currently recommends HIV screening at least annually among sexually active gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (MSM), but only half report being tested in the past year in the United States. As HIV self-test kits are becoming more available around the United States via web and app-based interventions, it is important to understand who is willing and able to order them. This analysis sought to better understand predictors of free HIV self-test kit utilization among MSM in M-cubed, an HIV prevention mobile app intervention trial in Atlanta, Detroit and New York City.

methodsWe conducted an exploratory secondary analysis of self-report and in-app data collected from the intervention arm of the M-Cubed study from 24 January 2018 to 31 October 2019. Behavioural, demographic and other potential predictors of HIV self-test ordering were identified from Social Cognitive Theoretical underpinnings of the app, and from the literature. Significant predictor variables in bivariate analyses were considered for inclusion in the empiric multivariable model. Demographic variables chosen a priori were then added to a final model estimating adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR).

resultsOver half of the 417 intervention participants ordered an HIV self-test kit during the study. In bivariate analyses, ordering a kit was associated with HIV testing history, plans to get tested and reported likelihood of getting tested. In the final model, participants were more likely to order a kit if they reported plans to get tested in the next 3 months (aPR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.18-2.11) or had not tested for HIV in the past 3 months (aPR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.13-1.70). There was no difference in HIV self-test kit ordering by income, race/ethnicity or age.

conclusionsHIV testing is an important tool in ending the HIV epidemic and must be accessible and frequent for key populations. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of HIV self-test kits in reaching populations with suboptimal testing rates and shows that self-testing may supplement community-based and clinical testing while helping overcome some of the structural barriers that limit access to annual HIV prevention services for MSM.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsMobile ApplicationsSexual and Gender MinoritiesHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleNew York CitySelf-Testingdigital divideHIVHIV testingmen who have sex with menmobile appsself-testing

Identifiers

PMID37221941
PMCPMC10206409
OpenAlexW4377939063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.