Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37221898›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2023

Lactobacillus crispatus-dominated vaginal microbiome and Acinetobacter-dominated seminal microbiome support beneficial ART outcome.

Kairi Koort, Kristiina Sõsa, Silver Türk, Eleri Lapp, Elle Talving, Peeter Karits, Karin Rosenstein, Madis Jaagura, Aire Sekavin, Deniss Sõritsa and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. All Properties of Infertility Microbiome in a Review Article.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Understanding the Associations of Urogenital Microbiomes With Fertility and In Vitro Fertilization.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Kairi KoortSchool of Natural Sciences and Health, Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia.
Kristiina SõsaSchool of Natural Sciences and Health, Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia.
Silver TürkCompetence Center on Health Technologies, Tartu, Estonia.
Eleri LappCompetence Center on Health Technologies, Tartu, Estonia.
Elle TalvingNova Vita Clinic, Tallinn, Estonia.
Peeter KaritsNova Vita Clinic, Tallinn, Estonia.
Karin RosensteinCompetence Center on Health Technologies, Tartu, Estonia.
Madis JaaguraNova Vita Clinic, Tallinn, Estonia.
Aire SekavinWomen's Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
Deniss SõritsaCompetence Center on Health Technologies, Tartu, Estonia.
Kai HaldreWest Tallinn Central Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-0260-986X
Helle KarroWomen's Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
Paul KorrovitsCompetence Center on Health Technologies, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0001-9615-0481
Andres SalumetsCompetence Center on Health Technologies, Tartu, Estonia.
Reet MändarCompetence Center on Health Technologies, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-9747-3618
Competence Centre on Health Technologies (Estonia) · EETartu University Hospital · EETallinn University · EEEast Tallinn Central Hospital · EEKarolinska University Hospital · SEUniversity of Tartu · EE

Funding

Enterprise Estonia EU48695Estonian Ministry of Education and Research KOGU-HUMBEstonian Research Council IUT34-19Estonian Research Council PRG1076Eureka Eurostars ReadUteru projectEuropean Commission EU952516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite the considerable progress made in assisted reproductive technologies (ART), the implantation rate of transferred embryos remains low and in many cases, the reasons for failure remain unclear. We aimed to determine the potential impact of female and male partners' reproductive tract microbiome composition on ART outcome. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe ART couples (n = 97) and healthy couples (n = 12) were recruited into the study. The smaller healthy group underwent a careful selection according to their reproductive and general health criteria. Both vaginal and semen samples were subjected to 16S rDNA sequencing to reveal the bacterial diversity and identify distinct microbial community types. Ethics statement The study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee on Human Research of Tartu University, Tartu, Estonia (protocol no. 193/T-16) on 31 May 2010. Participation in the research was voluntary. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants.

resultsThe men with Acinetobacter-associated community who had children in the past, had the highest ART success rate (P < 0.05). The women with bacterial vaginosis vaginal microbiome community and with L. iners-predominant and L. gasseri-predominant microbiome had a lower ART success rate than women with the L. crispatus-predominant or the mixed lactic-acid-bacteria-predominant type (P < 0.05). The 15 couples where both partners had beneficial microbiome types had a superior ART success rate of 53%, when compared with the rest of the couples (25%; P = 0.023).

conclusionsMicrobiome disturbances in the genital tract of both partners tend to be associated with couple's infertility as well as lower ART success levels and may thus need attention before the ART procedure. The incorporation of genitourinary microbial screening as a part of the diagnostic evaluation process may become routine for ART patients if our results are confirmed by other studies.

Indexed as

Lactobacillus crispatusMicrobiotaVaginosis, BacterialChildFemaleHumansMaleReproductive Techniques, AssistedVaginaassisted reproductive technologies (ART)coupleinfertilitymicrobiomereproductive tractsemen

Identifiers

PMID37221898
PMCPMC10333654
OpenAlexW4377940088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.