Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37221700›Full record

SynthesisJournal of pediatric psychology2023

Systematic Review of Instruments Assessing Psychosocial Adaptation and Outcomes Among Families of Children With Congenital Heart Disease.

Karen J Eagleson, Desiree McCombs, Tiffany M Gerlich, Robert N Justo, Nadine A Kasparian, Samudragupta Bora

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Resilience in families of children with dextro-transposition of the great arteries.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen J EaglesonMater Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9134-4188
Desiree McCombsMater Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Australia.
Tiffany M GerlichMater Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Australia.
Robert N JustoQueensland Paediatric Cardiac Service, Queensland Children's Hospital, Australia.
Nadine A KasparianCincinnati Children's Center for Heart Disease and Mental Health, Heart Institute and Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8075-6817
Samudragupta BoraMater Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2342-4482
The University of Queensland · AUChildren's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service · AUCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis systematic review identified instruments quantitatively assessing psychosocial adaptation and outcomes in families of children with congenital heart disease (CHD) and evaluated instrument psychometrics.

methodsFollowing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and a prospectively registered protocol, electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS) were searched from inception until June 20, 2021 for peer-reviewed articles published in English, reporting quantitative data on psychosocial outcomes among parents/caregivers, siblings, or family system. Instrument characteristics and psychometrics were extracted, and adapted COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria were applied to assess instrument quality. Descriptive statistics and narrative synthesis were used for analysis.

resultsOverall, 108 articles reporting on 107 distinct samples across 26 countries met inclusion. Across those articles, 40 instruments assessed psychological functioning or distress, 12 assessed coping, 11 assessed quality of life constructs, 10 assessed parenting stress/caregiver burden, 10 assessed family functioning/impact, 10 assessed stress appraisal, 5 assessed sibling psychosocial outcomes, and 2 assessed couple relationship satisfaction/strain. Applying COSMIN criteria to available data on original instrument development articles/manuals for English language instruments (n = 54), 67% scored a positive property evidence rating for content validity, 39% for internal consistency, 4% for test-retest reliability, and 9% for responsiveness (longitudinal validity).

conclusionsStudies vary widely in instruments used to assess psychosocial adaptation and outcomes among families of children with CHD. Instrument selection informed by robust key psychometrics, increased psychometric reporting, development of both a "toolkit" approach and a comprehensive CHD-specific family instrument are among key recommendations.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalQuality of LifeAdaptation, PsychologicalCaregiversChildHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of Resultscongenital heart diseasefamilyhigh-risk infantneurodevelopmentpsychological functioningquality of life

Identifiers

PMID37221700
PMCPMC10321401
OpenAlexW4377939036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.