Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37221624›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2023

Validation of circulating histone detection by mass spectrometry for early diagnosis, prognosis, and management of critically ill septic patients.

José Luis García-Giménez, Eva García-López, Salvador Mena-Mollá, Jesús Beltrán-García, Rebeca Osca-Verdegal, Elena Nacher-Sendra, Carmen Aguado-Velasco, Germán Casabó-Vallés, Carlos Romá-Mateo, María Rodriguez-Gimillo and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

José Luis García-Giménez *Center for Biomedical Research Network On Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Carlos III Health Institute, Valencia, Spain. j.luis.garcia@uv.es.ORCID 0000-0001-7547-7872
Eva García-López *Center for Biomedical Research Network On Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Carlos III Health Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Salvador Mena-MolláDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Jesús Beltrán-GarcíaCenter for Biomedical Research Network On Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Carlos III Health Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Rebeca Osca-VerdegalCenter for Biomedical Research Network On Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Carlos III Health Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Elena Nacher-SendraINCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Carmen Aguado-VelascoINCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Germán Casabó-VallésEpiDisease S.L. (Spin-Off CIBER-ISCIII), Parc Científic de la Universitat de València, Paterna, Valencia, Spain.
Carlos Romá-MateoCenter for Biomedical Research Network On Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Carlos III Health Institute, Valencia, Spain.
María Rodriguez-GimilloINCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Oreto AntúnezProteomics Unit, SCSIE-University of Valencia, Burjassot, València, Spain.
José FerreresINCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Federico V PallardóCenter for Biomedical Research Network On Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Carlos III Health Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Nieves CarbonellINCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Valencia, Spain. edurnecarbonell@yahoo.es.
Universitat de València · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESParc Científic de la Universitat de València · ESHospital General Universitario De Valencia · ESINCLIVA Health Research Institute · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs leading contributors to worldwide morbidity and mortality, sepsis and septic shock are considered a major global health concern. Proactive biomarker identification in patients with sepsis suspicion at any time remains a daunting challenge for hospitals. Despite great progress in the understanding of clinical and molecular aspects of sepsis, its definition, diagnosis, and treatment remain challenging, highlighting a need for new biomarkers with potential to improve critically ill patient management. In this study we validate a quantitative mass spectrometry method to measure circulating histone levels in plasma samples for the diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis and septic shock patients.

methodsWe used the mass spectrometry technique of multiple reaction monitoring to quantify circulating histones H2B and H3 in plasma from a monocenter cohort of critically ill patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and evaluated its performance for the diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis and septic shock (SS).

resultsOur results highlight the potential of our test for early diagnosis of sepsis and SS. H2B levels above 121.40 ng/mL (IQR 446.70) were indicative of SS. The value of blood circulating histones to identify a subset of SS patients in a more severe stage with associated organ failure was also tested, revealing circulating levels of histones H2B above 435.61 ng/ml (IQR 2407.10) and H3 above 300.61 ng/ml (IQR 912.77) in septic shock patients with organ failure requiring invasive organ support therapies. Importantly, we found levels of H2B and H3 above 400.44 ng/mL (IQR 1335.54) and 258.25 (IQR 470.44), respectively in those patients who debut with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Finally, a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) demonstrated the prognostic value of circulating histone H3 to predict fatal outcomes and found for histone H3 an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.720 (CI 0.546-0.895) p < 0.016 on a positive test cut-off point at 486.84 ng/mL, showing a sensitivity of 66.7% and specificity of 73.9%.

conclusionsCirculating histones analyzed by MS can be used to diagnose SS and identify patients at high risk of suffering DIC and fatal outcome.

Indexed as

SepsisShock, SepticCritical IllnessEarly DiagnosisHistonesHumansMass SpectrometryPrognosisHistonesDiagnosisDisseminated intravascular coagulationHistonesMass spectrometryPrognosisSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID37221624
PMCPMC10204297
OpenAlexW4377939690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.