Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37221503›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2023

Developing patient-refined colorectal cancer screening materials: application of a virtual community engagement approach.

Priyanka Gautom, Anne L Escaron, Joanna Garcia, Jamie H Thompson, Jennifer S Rivelli, Esmeralda Ruiz, Evelyn Torres-Ozadali, Dawn M Richardson, Gloria D Coronado

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Developing Patient-Refined Messaging for Follow-Up Colonoscopy After Abnormal Fecal Testing in Hispanic Communities: Key Learnings from Virtual Boot Camp Translation.Hispanic health care international : the official journal of the National Association of Hispanic Nurses · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Priyanka GautomOHSU-PSU School of Public Health, 1810 SW 5th Ave, Portland, OR, 97201, USA. pgautom@pdx.edu.
Anne L EscaronInstitute for Health Equity, AltaMed Health Services Corp, 2040 Camfield Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90040, USA.
Joanna GarciaInstitute for Health Equity, AltaMed Health Services Corp, 2040 Camfield Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90040, USA.
Jamie H ThompsonKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA.
Jennifer S RivelliKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA.
Esmeralda RuizInstitute for Health Equity, AltaMed Health Services Corp, 2040 Camfield Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90040, USA.
Evelyn Torres-OzadaliInstitute for Health Equity, AltaMed Health Services Corp, 2040 Camfield Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90040, USA.
Dawn M RichardsonOHSU-PSU School of Public Health, 1810 SW 5th Ave, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
Gloria D CoronadoKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA.
AltaMed · USKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Portland · US

Funding

Participatory Research to Advance Colon Cancer PreventionU01MD010665 · NIMHD · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CORONADO, GLORIA D · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
NIMHD NIH HHS 3U01MD010665-05S1NIMHD NIH HHS U01 MD010665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn partnership with a federally qualified health center (FQHC), an adapted virtual version of boot camp translation (BCT) was used to elicit input from Spanish-speaking Latino patients and staff to develop messaging and patient education materials for follow-up colonoscopy after abnormal fecal testing. We describe how we adapted an existing in-person BCT process to be delivered virtually and present evaluations from participants on the virtual format.

methodsThree virtual BCT sessions were facilitated by bilingual staff and conducted via Zoom. These sessions included introductions and discussions on colorectal cancer (CRC), CRC screening, and gathered feedback from participants on draft materials. Ten adults were recruited from the FQHC. A research team member from the FQHC served as the point of contact (POC) for all participants and offered Zoom introductory sessions and/or technology support before and during the sessions. Following the third session, participants were invited to complete an evaluation form about their virtual BCT experience. Using a 5-point Likert Scale (where 5 = strongly agree), questions focused on session utility, group comfort level, session pacing, and overall sense of accomplishment.

resultsAverage scores ranged from 4.3 to 5.0 indicating strong support towards the virtual BCT sessions. Additionally, our study emphasized the importance of a POC to provide technical support to participants throughout the process. Using this approach, we successfully incorporated feedback from participants to design culturally relevant materials to promote follow-up colonoscopy.

conclusionWe recommend ongoing public health emphasis on the use of virtual platforms for community engaged work.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerNeoplasmsAdultColonoscopyHumansTranslationsBoot camp translationColorectal cancer screeningCommunity engagementFederally qualified health centerVirtual platform

Identifiers

PMID37221503
PMCPMC10205160
OpenAlexW4377861954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.