Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37221425›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2023

Longitudinal Assessment of the Choroidal Vascularity Index in Eyes with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion-Associated Cystoid Macular Edema.

Praruj Pant, Anita Kundu, Jay K Rathinavelu, Xin Wei, Rupesh Agrawal, Sandra S Stinnett, Jane S Kim, Akshay S Thomas, Sharon Fekrat

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Characteristics of vortex vein in healthy eyes and fundus diseases imaged by ultra-widefield OCTA.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Praruj PantDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, 2531 Erwin Rd., Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Anita KunduDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, 2531 Erwin Rd., Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Jay K RathinaveluDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, 2531 Erwin Rd., Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Xin WeiNational Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Rupesh AgrawalNational Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Sandra S StinnettDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, 2531 Erwin Rd., Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Jane S KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, 2531 Erwin Rd., Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Akshay S ThomasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, 2531 Erwin Rd., Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Sharon FekratDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, 2531 Erwin Rd., Durham, NC, 27705, USA. Sharon.fekrat@duke.edu.
Duke University · USTan Tock Seng Hospital · SG

Funding

VitreoRetinal Surgery Foundation 388000009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCystoid macular edema (CME) is the most common cause of central vision loss in eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO eyes). In recent literature, choroidal vascularity index (CVI) has been proposed to be an enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) metric that may help characterize choroidal vascular changes in the setting of retinal ischemia, and potentially prognose visual outcomes and treatment patterns for patients with BRVO-related CME. This study sought to further characterize choroidal vascular changes in BRVO by comparing the CVI, subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and central subfield thickness (CST) in BRVO eyes with CME compared to unaffected fellow eyes.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study. Subjects included treatment-naïve BRVO eyes with CME diagnosed within 3 months of onset of symptoms and unaffected fellow eyes. EDI-OCT images were collected at baseline and at the 12-month follow-up visit. CVI, SFCT, and CST were measured. Demographics, treatment patterns, and best-corrected visual acuity (VA) were abstracted. Median CVI, SFCT, CST, and VA were compared between the two cohorts. Longitudinal relationships between these variables were analyzed.

resultsA total of 52 treatment-naïve eyes with BRVO and CME and 48 unaffected fellow eyes were identified. Baseline CVI was lower in eyes with BRVO than in fellow eyes (64.7% vs. 66.4%, P = 0.003). At 12 months, there was no difference in CVI between BRVO eyes and fellow eyes (65.7% vs 65.8%, P = 0.536). In BRVO eyes, there was a strong correlation between reduced CST and improved VA over the 12-month study period (r = 0.671, P < 0.001).

conclusionThere are differences in CVI in treatment-naïve BRVO eyes with CME at presentation compared to fellow eyes, but these differences resolve over time. Anatomic changes in macular thickness in BRVO eyes with CME may be correlated with VA outcomes.

Indexed as

Branch retinal vein occlusionChoroidal vascularity indexCystoid macular edemaOptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID37221425
PMCPMC10287880
OpenAlexW4377692750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.