Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37221409›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2023

Observer studies of image quality of denoising reduced-count cardiac single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging by three-dimensional Gaussian post-reconstruction filtering and deep learning.

P Hendrik Pretorius, Junchi Liu, Kesava S Kalluri, Yulei Jiang, Jeffery A Leppo, Seth T Dahlberg, Janusz Kikut, Matthew W Parker, Friederike K Keating, Robert Licho and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. AI in SPECT Imaging: Opportunities and Challenges.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

P Hendrik PretoriusDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA. Hendrik.Pretorius@umassmed.edu.
Junchi LiuElectrical and Computer Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kesava S KalluriDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Yulei JiangUniversity of Chicago SSA, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jeffery A LeppoUniversity of Massachusetts System, Boston, MA, USA.
Seth T DahlbergCardiovascular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Janusz KikutUniversity of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA.
Matthew W ParkerCardiovascular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Friederike K KeatingUniversity of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA.
Robert LichoUMass Memorial Medical Center - University Campus, Worcester, MA, USA.
Benjamin AuerBrigham and Women's Hospital Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA.
Clifford LindsayDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Arda KonikDana-Farber Cancer Institute Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, MA, USA.
Yongyi YangElectrical and Computer Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA.
Miles N WernickElectrical and Computer Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA.
Michael A KingDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.

Funding

Optimization of diagnostic accuracy, radiation dose, and patient throughput for cardiac SPECT via advanced and clinically practical cardiac-respiratory motion correction and deep learningR01HL154687 · NHLBI · ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KING, MICHAEL A, YANG, YONGYI · 2020 to 2023
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL154687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this research was to asses perfusion-defect detection-accuracy by human observers as a function of reduced-counts for 3D Gaussian post-reconstruction filtering vs deep learning (DL) denoising to determine if there was improved performance with DL.

methodsSPECT projection data of 156 normally interpreted patients were used for these studies. Half were altered to include hybrid perfusion defects with defect presence and location known. Ordered-subset expectation-maximization (OSEM) reconstruction was employed with the optional correction of attenuation (AC) and scatter (SC) in addition to distance-dependent resolution (RC). Count levels varied from full-counts (100%) to 6.25% of full-counts. The denoising strategies were previously optimized for defect detection using total perfusion deficit (TPD). Four medical physicist (PhD) and six physician (MD) observers rated the slices using a graphical user interface. Observer ratings were analyzed using the LABMRMC multi-reader, multi-case receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) software to calculate and compare statistically the area-under-the-ROC-curves (AUCs).

resultsFor the same count-level no statistically significant increase in AUCs for DL over Gaussian denoising was determined when counts were reduced to either the 25% or 12.5% of full-counts. The average AUC for full-count OSEM with solely RC and Gaussian filtering was lower than for the strategies with AC and SC, except for a reduction to 6.25% of full-counts, thus verifying the utility of employing AC and SC with RC.

conclusionWe did not find any indication that at the dose levels investigated and with the DL network employed, that DL denoising was superior in AUC to optimized 3D post-reconstruction Gaussian filtering.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMyocardial Perfusion ImagingHeartHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingROC CurveTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photondeep learningdenoisingMPIobserver studySPECT

Identifiers

PMID37221409
PMCPMC11401514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.