Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37221330›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2023

Experience with Contraceptive Dosage Forms and Interest in Novel PrEP Technologies in Women.

Claudia J Jansen van Vuuren, Lara Lewis, Ishana Harkoo, Halima Dawood, Leila E Mansoor

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claudia J Jansen van VuurenCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1404-7745
Lara LewisCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Ishana HarkooCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Halima DawoodCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Leila E MansoorCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa. Leila.mansoor@caprisa.org.
Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa · ZA

Funding

FHI 360 AID-674-A-14-00009United States Agency for International Development AID-OAA-A-15-00040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) strategies tailored to the needs and expectations of individuals at risk of HIV acquisition are needed. In the CAPRISA 082 prospective cohort study in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, sexually active women aged 18 to 30 reported, through interviewer-administered questionnaires, on their prior contraceptive experience and interest in both approved and potential future PrEP dosage forms (oral PrEP, long-acting injectable PrEP, and PrEP implants) between March 2016 and February 2018. Univariable and multivariable Poisson regression models with robust standard errors were used to detect associations between women's prior and current contraceptive use and interest in PrEP options. Of 425 women enrolled, 381 (89.6%) had used at least one modern female contraceptive method previously, with injectable depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) being used by 79.8% (n = 339). Women were more likely to show interest in a future PrEP implant if they were currently using (aRR 2.1, CI 1.43-3.07, p = 0.0001) or had ever used (aRR 1.65, CI 1.14-2.40, p = 0.0087) a contraceptive implant, and were more likely to choose an implant as their first choice method than the implant-naïve (current users aRR 3.2, CI 1.79-5.73, p < 0.0001; "ever" users aRR 2.12, CI 1.16-3.86, p = 0.0142). Women were more interested in injectable PrEP if they had used injectable contraceptives (current users aRR 1.24, CI 1.06-1.46, p = 0.0088; "ever" users aRR 1.72, CI 1.20-2.48, p = 0.0033); and were more interested in oral PrEP if they had ever used oral contraceptives (aRR 1.3, CI 1.06-1.59, p = 0.0114). This apparent relationship between women's contraceptive experience and their interest in novel forms of PrEP in an equivalent dosage form may play a future role in strengthening HIV prevention efforts in women at high risk of HIV acquisition.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsContraceptive Agents, FemaleHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdolescentAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorDosage FormsDrug ImplantsFemaleHumansMedroxyprogesterone AcetateProspective StudiesSouth AfricaSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-HIV AgentsContraceptive Agents, FemaleDosage FormsDrug ImplantsMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMultipurpose preventive technologiesPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)PrEP preferencePrior contraceptive useSexual and reproductive health (SRH)

Identifiers

PMID37221330
PMCPMC10589132
OpenAlexW4377861668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.