ArticleSpine deformity2023
Change of vertebral orientation, between the supine position and the prone position.
Article in Spine deformity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance and safety of the PYTHEAS Your Guided TrajectoryJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Trial
- Remote Orthotic Fabrication Method Using Small Three-Dimensional Printers and Computed Tomography Data: A Technical Report.Fukushima journal of medical science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOur aim was to assess the change of vertebral orientation, expressed in the sagittal plane, in the transversal plane and in the frontal plane, at each level from T1 to S1 between the supine position (like in in a CT scan) and the prone position lying on bolsters like in an OR.
methodsThirty-six patients were selected and included for a total number of one hundred and forty-eight vertebral levels. There were 30 females and 6 males. The mean age was 15 years and 9 months. A semi-automatic image processing technique and software (3D slicer), with a custom-made python script add-on, was used for each patient: paired preoperative CT scan and intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan were processed to acquire complete spinal reconstructions in a consistent 3D coordinate system. The aim was to automatically compute a set of sagittal, transversal, and frontal rotations of each vertebral level of the same patient describing the 3D vertebral rotation between the supine position and the prone position lying on bolsters.
resultsFor sagittal analysis, the results showed a behavior in the evolution of rotation depending on the level. Between T01 and T10, the rotation was between - 14° and - 8°. Between T10 and L05, the sagittal rotation increased from - 10° up to + 10°. For frontal and transversal analysis, the rotations were under 6.5°.
conclusionThese results could be valuable to perform a safe virtual templating: the information given by the virtual templating seems to be more accurate in the transversal plane than in the sagittal plane.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.