Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37221295›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Sting and p53 DNA repair pathways are compromised in Alzheimer's disease.

Thomas J Nelson, Yunhui Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Resistance of E2F4DN to p38Scientific reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The DREAM complex links somatic mutation, lifespan, and disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Inhibition of the cGAS-STING pathwayChemical science · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas J NelsonDepartment of Neurology, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, 25704, USA. nelsonth@marshall.edu.
Yunhui XuDepartment of Neurology, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, 25704, USA.
Marshall University · US

Funding

NIA NIH HHS R01 AG061780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia. A common finding in AD is DNA damage. Double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) are particularly hazardous to neurons because their post-mitotic state forces neurons to rely on error-prone and potentially mutagenic mechanisms to repair DNA breaks. However, it remains unclear whether DNA damage results from increased DNA damage or failure of DNA repair. Oligomerization of the tumor suppressor protein p53 is an essential part of DSB repair, and p53 phosphorylated on S15 is an indicator of DNA damage. We report that the monomer:dimer ratio of phosphorylated (S15) p53 is increased by 2.86-fold in temporal lobes of AD patients compared to age-matched controls, indicating that p53 oligomerization is compromised in AD. In vitro oxidation of p53 with 100 nM H

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairHumansHydrogen PeroxideInterferonsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Hydrogen PeroxideInterferonsTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID37221295
PMCPMC10206146
OpenAlexW4377939044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.