ArticleScientific reports2023
Novel in vivo endometriotic models associated eutopic endometrium by implanting menstrual blood-derived stromal cells from patients with endometriosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential and Challenges of Menstrual Blood-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells/Stromal Cells in Treating Female Infertility: A Recent Review.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Review
- Whole genome methylation profiling of menstrual stem cells identifies novel biomarkers for endometriosis.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Intra-ovarian injection of autologous menstrual blood-derived-mesenchymal stromal cells: a safe and promising method to improve pregnancy rate in poor ovarian responders.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Observational
- Modelling Endometriosis Using In Vitro and In Vivo Systems.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Unveiling the fibrotic puzzle of endometriosis: An overlooked concern calling for prompt action.F1000Research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The eutopic endometrium provides novel insights into endometriotic pathophysiology and treatment. However, no in vivo models currently available are suitable for eutopic endometrium in endometriosis. In this study, we present new endometriotic in vivo models associated with eutopic endometrium using menstrual blood-derived stromal cells (MenSCs). First, we isolated endometriotic MenSCs (E-MenSCs) and healthy MenSCs (H-MenSCs) from the menstrual blood of patients with endometriosis (n = 6) and healthy volunteers (n = 6). Then, we identified MenSCs' endometrial stromal cell properties using adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation. A cell counting kit-8 and wound healing assay were used to compare the proliferation and migration capability between E-MenSCs and H-MenSCs. Seventy female nude mice were used to prepare endometriotic models related to eutopic endometrium by implanting E-MenSCs relying on three approaches, including surgical implantation using scaffolds seeded with MenSCs, and subcutaneous injection of MenSCs in the abdomen and the back (n = 10). H-MenSCs or scaffolds only were implanted in control groups (n = 10). One month after the surgical implantation and 1 week after the subcutaneous injection, we evaluated modeling by hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) and immunofluorescent staining of human leukocyte antigen α (HLAA). Fibroblast morphology, lipid droplets, and calcium nodules in E-MenSCs and H-MenSCs identified their endometrial stromal cell properties. We noticed that the proliferation and migration of E-MenSCs were considerably enhanced compared to H-MenSCs (P < 0.05). E-MenSCs implanted in nude mice formed ectopic lesions using three approaches (n = 10; lesions formation rate: 90%, 115%, and 80%; average volumes: 123.60, 27.37, and 29.56 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.