ArticleScientific reports2023
Live birth rate following a failed first in vitro fertilization cycle with no embryos for transfer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Another round, another chance: oocyte developmental competence and outcomes in second IVF attempts-the earlier, the better.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Observational
- Determinants of clinical pregnancy outcomes in women with diminished ovarian reserve undergoing repeated assisted reproductive technology cycles: a retrospective cohort analysis of 3,895 oocyte retrieval cycles.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- High proportion of zygotes with multiple pronuclei increase the embryo multinucleation rate during conventional IVF.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
After a failed in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedure in which no transferable embryo was obtained, the possibility of a subsequent pregnancy for the patient is unknown. We conducted a cohort retrospective study evaluating the live birth rate in the subsequent cycles of the patients with no embryo for transfer in their first IVF attempt between 2017and 2020. The first cycle variables of patients who conceived in subsequent cycles were compared to those who did not. Additionally, for patients who conceived at last, variables related to ovarian stimulation were compared between the first cycle and the conceiving cycle. In accordance with the inclusion criteria, 529 were enrolled during the study period, of which 230 had successful pregnancies and 192 gave birth to a live infant. Cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) per cycle and patient were 26% and 36% respectively. Moreover, 99% of the live births were obtained within the first three attempts, beyond six cycles, there was no pregnancy. Stimulating variables in the first cycle were not effective in predicting the likelihood of a patient's subsequent pregnancy. Overall, patients who did not have embryos available for transfer in the first cycle had a 36% chance of getting a live birth in subsequent attempts, and the cause of failure should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.