Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37221019›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Improving skin health of community-dwelling older people: a scoping review protocol.

Jan Kottner, Alexandra Fastner, Dimitra-Aikaterini Lintzeri, Christopher E M Griffiths, Ulrike Blume-Peytavi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Skin health of community-living older people: a scoping review.Archives of dermatological research · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jan KottnerInstitute of Clinical Nursing Science, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany jan.kottner@charite.de.ORCID 0000-0003-0750-3818
Alexandra FastnerInstitute of Clinical Nursing Science, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8718-8397
Dimitra-Aikaterini LintzeriDepartment of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christopher E M GriffithsDepartment of Dermatology, King's College Hospital, King's College London, London, UK.
Ulrike Blume-PeytaviDepartment of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAgeing is accompanied by an age-related decrease in mobility or cognitive and sensory functions; in addition, physiological changes in the skin occur with age. Therefore, the skin requires appropriate care and observation in order to prevent or manage a variety of dermatological diseases and conditions, and to prevent or minimise effects on the quality of life.Globally, most older people live at home, and the need to establish sustainable structures and processes to support and to care for people at home for as long as possible has been emphasised. The body of evidence supporting screening, diagnosis and management of skin conditions in older people living at home has not been collated and summarised to date. The aim of this scoping review is to describe and summarise the extent and nature of the available body of evidence in this regard. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Eligibility criteria were developed using the Population, Concept and Context framework, and the search will focus on systematic and scoping reviews as well as clinical practice guidelines. Two reviewers will conduct systematic searches, screen and select identified evidence as well as extract and chart data, independently. Finally, data will be systematically analysed and summarised descriptively to map existing evidence and identify gaps. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Due to the nature of research, not involving humans or unpublished secondary data, approval of an ethics committee is not required. The dissemination of findings is planned via professional networks and publication in scientific open access journals.

Indexed as

Independent LivingQuality of LifeAgedAgingEligibility DeterminationHumansScoping Reviews as TopicSkinAgedDermatological epidemiologyDERMATOLOGYGeriatric dermatologyPRIMARY CAREProtocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID37221019
PMCPMC10231012
OpenAlexW4377940130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.