ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2023
Beyond the reference: gene expression variation and transcriptional response to RNA interference in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Network Properties Influence Covariance Between Gene Expression and Fecundity Fitness of Caenorhabditis elegans in a Novel Laboratory Environment.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Hookworm genes encoding intestinal excreted-secreted proteins are transcriptionally upregulated in response to the host's immune system.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- The regulatory architecture of gene expression variation in Caenorhabditis elegans revealed by multi-strain allele-specific analysis.Genetics · 2025Article
- The regulatory architecture of gene expression variation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Diversification of small RNA pathways underlies germline RNA interference incompetence in wild Caenorhabditis elegans strains.Genetics · 2024Article
- A web application for gene-based queries of CaeNDR RNA-seq data.microPublication biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Though natural systems harbor genetic and phenotypic variation, research in model organisms is often restricted to a reference strain. Focusing on a reference strain yields a great depth of knowledge but potentially at the cost of breadth of understanding. Furthermore, tools developed in the reference context may introduce bias when applied to other strains, posing challenges to defining the scope of variation within model systems. Here, we evaluate how genetic differences among 5 wild Caenorhabditis elegans strains affect gene expression and its quantification, in general and after induction of the RNA interference (RNAi) response. Across strains, 34% of genes were differentially expressed in the control condition, including 411 genes that were not expressed at all in at least 1 strain; 49 of these were unexpressed in reference strain N2. Reference genome mapping bias caused limited concern: despite hyperdiverse hotspots throughout the genome, 92% of variably expressed genes were robust to mapping issues. The transcriptional response to RNAi was highly strain- and target-gene-specific and did not correlate with RNAi efficiency, as the 2 RNAi-insensitive strains showed more differentially expressed genes following RNAi treatment than the RNAi-sensitive reference strain. We conclude that gene expression, generally and in response to RNAi, differs across C. elegans strains such that the choice of strain may meaningfully influence scientific inferences. Finally, we introduce a resource for querying gene expression variation in this dataset at https://wildworm.biosci.gatech.edu/rnai/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.