Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37220908›Full record

ArticleBMB reports2023

The impact of cancer cachexia on gut microbiota composition and short-chain fatty acid metabolism in a murine model.

Seung Min Jeong, Eun-Ju Jin, Shibo Wei, Ju-Hyeon Bae, Yosep Ji, Yunju Jo, Jee-Heon Jeong, Se Jin Im, Dongryeol Ryu

Open access · goldAbstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in BMB reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Involvement of the gut microbiota in cancer cachexia.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Seung Min JeongDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon 16419; HEM Inc., Suwon 16229, Korea.
Eun-Ju JinDepartment of Precision Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon 16419, Korea.
Shibo WeiDepartment of Precision Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon 16419, Korea.
Ju-Hyeon BaeDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon 16419, Korea.
Yosep JiHEM Inc., Suwon 16229, Korea.
Yunju JoDepartment of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju 61005, Korea.
Jee-Heon JeongDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon 16419, Korea.
Se Jin ImDepartment of Immunology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon 16419, Korea.
Dongryeol RyuDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon 16419; Department of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju 61005, Korea.
Sungkyunkwan University · KRGwangju Institute of Science and Technology · KRSuwon Research Institute · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between cancer cachexia and the gut microbiota, focusing on the influence of cancer on microbial composition. Lewis lung cancer cell allografts were used to induce cachexia in mice, and body and muscle weight changes were monitored. Fecal samples were collected for targeted metabolomic analysis for short chain fatty acids and microbiome analysis. The cachexia group exhibited lower alpha diversity and distinct beta diversity in gut microbiota, compared to the control group. Differential abundance analysis revealed higher Bifidobacterium and Romboutsia, but lower Streptococcus abundance in the cachexia group. Additionally, lower proportions of acetate and butyrate were observed in the cachexia group. The study observed that the impact of cancer cachexia on gut microbiota and their generated metabolites was significant, indicating a host-to-gut microbiota axis. [BMB Reports 2023; 56(7): 404-409].

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeNeoplasmsAnimalsButyratesCachexiaDisease Models, AnimalFatty Acids, VolatileMiceButyratesFatty Acids, Volatile

Identifiers

PMID37220908
PMCPMC10390285
OpenAlexW4376645167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.