Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37220898›Full record

ArticleQJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians2023

Real-world implementation of non-endoscopic triage testing for Barrett's oesophagus during COVID-19.

R Landy, S Killcoyne, C Tang, S Juniat, M O'Donovan, N Goel, M Gehrung, R C Fitzgerald

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advances in the Diagnosis of Barrett's Esophagus.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

R LandyDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4042-4820
S KillcoyneCyted Ltd, 22 Station Road, Cambridge CB1 2JD, UK.
C TangCyted Ltd, 22 Station Road, Cambridge CB1 2JD, UK.
S JuniatCyted Ltd, 22 Station Road, Cambridge CB1 2JD, UK.
M O'DonovanCyted Ltd, 22 Station Road, Cambridge CB1 2JD, UK.
N GoelCyted Ltd, 22 Station Road, Cambridge CB1 2JD, UK.
M GehrungCyted Ltd, 22 Station Road, Cambridge CB1 2JD, UK.
R C FitzgeraldDepartment of Oncology, Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK.
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/W014122/1NCI NIH HHSNIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) curtailed endoscopy services, adding to diagnostic backlogs. Building on trial evidence for a non-endoscopic oesophageal cell collection device coupled with biomarkers (Cytosponge), an implementation pilot was launched for patients on waiting lists for reflux and Barrett's oesophagus surveillance.

aims(i) To review reflux referral patterns and Barrett's surveillance practices. (ii) To evaluate the range of Cytosponge findings and impact on endoscopy services. DESIGN AND

methodsCytosponge data from centralized laboratory processing (trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) for intestinal metaplasia (IM), haematoxylin & eosin for cellular atypia and p53 for dysplasia) over a 2-year period were included.

resultsA total of 10 577 procedures were performed in 61 hospitals in England and Scotland, of which 92.5% (N = 9784/10 577) were sufficient for analysis. In the reflux cohort (N = 4074 with gastro-oesophageal junction sampling), 14.7% had one or more positive biomarkers (TFF3: 13.6% (N = 550/4056), p53: 0.5% (21/3974), atypia: 1.5% (N = 63/4071)), requiring endoscopy. Among samples from individuals undergoing Barrett's surveillance (N = 5710 with sufficient gland groups), TFF3-positivity increased with segment length (odds ratio = 1.37 per cm (95% confidence interval: 1.33-1.41, P < 0.001)). Some surveillance referrals (21.5%, N = 1175/5471) had ≤1 cm segment length, of which 65.9% (707/1073) were TFF3 negative. Of all surveillance procedures, 8.3% had dysplastic biomarkers (4.0% (N = 225/5630) for p53 and 7.6% (N = 430/5694) for atypia), increasing to 11.8% (N = 420/3552) in TFF3+ cases with confirmed IM and 19.7% (N = 58/294) in ultra-long segments.

conclusionsCytosponge-biomarker tests enabled targeting of endoscopy services to higher-risk individuals, whereas those with TFF3 negative ultra-short segments could be reconsidered regarding their Barrett's oesophagus status and surveillance requirements. Long-term follow-up will be important in these cohorts.

Indexed as

Barrett EsophagusCOVID-19Esophageal NeoplasmsBiomarkersEndoscopyHumansTriageTumor Suppressor Protein p53BiomarkersTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID37220898
PMCPMC10497181
OpenAlexW4377605752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.