Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37220788›Full record

ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2023

[The Perspectives of Stakeholders on Users of Care Robotics at the Intersection of Age and Gender - Results of a Qualitative Analysis].

Merle Weßel, Niklas Ellerich-Groppe, Mark Schweda, Frauke Koppelin

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Merle WeßelAbteilung Ethik in der Medizin, Department für Versorgungsforschung, Fakultät VI - Medizin und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7508-2934
Niklas Ellerich-GroppeAbteilung Ethik in der Medizin, Department für Versorgungsforschung, Fakultät VI - Medizin und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Germany.
Mark SchwedaAbteilung Ethik in der Medizin, Department für Versorgungsforschung, Fakultät VI - Medizin und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Germany.
Frauke KoppelinJade Hochschule Wilhelmshaven/Oldenburg/Elsfleth, Fachbereich Bauwesen Geoinformation Gesundheitstechnologe - Studienort Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEJade University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Having to face the challenges posed by a shortage of skilled care workers and an increasing number of older people in need of care, policy makers and economic enterprises perceive care robotics as a promising solution. However, studies have shown that potential users have little interest in technology and that technology developers have little knowledge about the needs and wishes of potential users. Against this background, this paper explores, based on 16 qualitative interviews with stakeholders from the area of technology development, marketing, and nursing care (science), which assumptions and expectations regarding age and gender of users are relevant in this field. The results revealed three perspectives of the stakeholders regarding the users of care robotics: 1) the need to take age and gender in development and implementation of care robotics was acknowledged, 2) the relevance of other social categories, such as education, culture and illness, was mentioned, and 3) the relevance of social categories was rejected altogether. These results are discussed in the context of discourses about diversity in care-robotics and conclusions are drawn for user-centred and diversity-sensitive technology development and implementation.

Indexed as

RoboticsAgedGermanyHealth PersonnelHumans

Identifiers

PMID37220788
PMCPMC11248739
OpenAlexW4377694142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.