ArticleJournal of King Saud University. Computer and information sciences2023
Multiple-level thresholding for breast mass detection.
Article in Journal of King Saud University. Computer and information sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reducing false positives in breast cancer screening with computer-aided detection.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- An Artificial Intelligence-Based Tool for Enhancing Pectoral Muscle Segmentation in Mammograms: Addressing Class Imbalance and Validation Challenges in Automated Breast Cancer Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Detection of breast mass plays a very important role in making the diagnosis of breast cancer. For faster detection of breast cancer caused by breast mass, we developed a novel and efficient patch-based breast mass detection system for mammography images. The proposed framework is comprised of three modules, including pre-processing, multiple-level breast tissue segmentation, and final breast mass detection. An improved Deeplabv3+ model for pectoral muscle removal is deployed in pre-processing. We then proposed a multiple-level thresholding segmentation method to segment breast mass and obtained the connected components (ConCs), where the corresponding image patch to each ConC is extracted for mass detection. In the final detection stage, each image patch is classified into breast mass and breast tissue background by trained deep learning models. The patches that are classified as breast mass are then taken as the candidates for breast mass. To reduce the false positive rate in the detection results, we applied the non-maximum suppression algorithm to combine the overlapped detection results. Once an image patch is considered a breast mass, the accurate detection result can then be retrieved from the corresponding ConC in the segmented images. Moreover, a coarse segmentation result can be simultaneously retrieved after detection. Compared to the state-of-the-art methods, the proposed method achieved comparable performance. On CBIS-DDSM, the proposed method achieved a detection sensitivity of 0.87 at 2.86 FPI (False Positive rate per Image), while the sensitivity reached 0.96 on INbreast with an FPI of only 1.29.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.