Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37220529›Full record

ReviewClinical epidemiology and global health

Monkeypox vaccination in the global south: Fighting a war without a weapon.

Isaac Olushola Ogunkola, Oyinloye Emmanuel Abiodun, Babatunde Ismail Bale, Emmanuel Ebuka Elebesunu, Somtochukwu Blessing Ujam, Innocent Chimaobi Umeh, Mfoniso Tom-James, Shuaibu Saidu Musa, Emery Manirambona, Salvador B Evardone and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical epidemiology and global health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Current advances and challenges in mpox vaccine development: a global landscape.Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Isaac Olushola OgunkolaDepartment of Public Health, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.
Oyinloye Emmanuel AbiodunDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Federal University, Oye, Ekiti, Nigeria.
Babatunde Ismail BaleDepartment of Optometry, University of Benin, Edo, Nigeria.
Emmanuel Ebuka ElebesunuDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, University of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria.
Somtochukwu Blessing UjamDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, University of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria.
Innocent Chimaobi UmehDepartment of Public Health, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.
Mfoniso Tom-JamesDepartment of Public Health, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.
Shuaibu Saidu MusaDepartment of Nursing Science, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
Emery ManirambonaCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Salvador B EvardoneEastern Visayas Medical Center, Tacloban, Philippines.
Don Eliseo Lucero-PrisnoDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Mpox outbreak awakened countries worldwide to renew efforts in epidemiological surveillance and vaccination of susceptible populations. In terms of Mpox vaccination, various challenges exist in the global south, which impede adequate vaccine coverage, especially in Africa. This paper reviewed the situation of Mpox vaccination in the global south and potential ameliorative approaches. Methods: A review of online literature from PubMed and Google Scholar concerning Mpox vaccination in countries belonging to the 'global south' category was done between August and September, 2022. The major focus areas included inequity in global vaccine distribution, challenges impeding vaccine coverage in the global south, and potential strategies for bridging the gap in vaccine equity. The papers that met the inclusion criteria were collated and narratively discussed. Results: Our analysis revealed that, while the high-income countries secured large supplies of the Mpox vaccines, the low- and middle-income countries were unable to independently access substantial quantities of the vaccine and had to rely on vaccine donations from high-income countries, as was the case during the COVID-19 pandemic. The challenges in the global south particularly revolved around inadequate vaccine production capacity due to lack of qualified personnel and specialized infrastructure for full vaccine development and manufacturing, limited cold chain equipment for vaccine distribution, and consistent vaccine hesitancy. Conclusion: To tackle the trend of vaccine inequity in the global south, African governments and international stakeholders must invest properly in adequate production and dissemination of Mpox vaccines in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Global northGlobal southHealth systemsInfectionMpoxVaccines

Identifiers

PMID37220529
PMCPMC10195808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.