ReviewClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2023
Co-Design as Enabling Factor for Patient-Centred Healthcare: A Bibliometric Literature Review.
Review in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Co-designing interventions for patients with inflammatory arthritis: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Relationship between staff experience and patient outcomes in hospital settings: an overview of reviews.BMJ open · 2025Pooled it
- How has co-design been used to address vaccine hesitancy globally? A systematic review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Pooled it
- Co-designing care for multimorbidity: a systematic review.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Engaging Service Users in Co-Designing a Nurse-Led Weight Talk Tool for Low- and Medium-Secure Mental Health Inpatient Settings: A Participatory Intervention Development Study.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Using cognitive interviews with children to test the content validity of a paediatric patient reported experience measure.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- A coherent family support model (Co-Fam) for preventing and treating childhood overweight and obesity: protocol for a randomized hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Quality of Life of People Living With Dementia Residing in Nursing Homes: Secondary Analysis of Observational Data.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Frameworks for Action: A Scoping Review of Organisational Patient Engagement Models in Healthcare.The International journal of health planning and management · 2026Article
- Description and Effectiveness of Environmental Approaches to Cognitive Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.Neuropsychology review · 2026Review
- "What Patients Want": a qualitative study of expectations and ideal clinical encounters in obesity consultations.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Article
- Scoping review of patient and family engagement interventions in diagnosis: a paradox of too much, yet so little.BMJ quality & safety · 2026Article
- 'Living Well With a PICC at Home': Co-Design and Evaluation of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Booklet.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Designing and implementing a prediabetes screening in community pharmacies and online prevention program: findings from the PREDICT study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Clinicians' perspectives of pain in older adults with heart failure.Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Co-designing an intergenerational dance programme using the 6SQuID framework: a development and proof-of-concept study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Professional consensus on UK national statements of best practice for ways of working to deliver orthotic interventions after stroke: an eDelphi study.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Development and Implementation of Novel Virtual Triage and Exploration of Attitudes Towards the Potential Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) Dietetic Pathway.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026Article
- Family interventions in dementia mental health environments (FIND ME): a mixed-methods protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Service design and in particular co-design are approaches able to align with the need of healthcare contexts of value-based and patient-centered processing through a participatory design of services. The purpose of this study is to identify the characteristics of co-design and its applicability to the reengineering of healthcare services, as well as to detect the peculiarities of the application of this approach in different geographical contexts. The methodology applied for the review, Systematic Literature Network Analysis (SLNA), combines qualitative and quantitative perspectives. In detail, the analysis applied the paper citation networks and the co-word network analysis to detect the main research trends over time and to identify the most relevant publications. The results of the analysis highlight the backbone of literature on the application of co-design in healthcare as well as the advantages and the critical factors of the approach. Three main literature streams emerged concerning the integration of the approach at meso and micro level, the implementation of co-design at mega and macro level, and the impacts on non-clinical related outcomes. Moreover, the findings underline differences in co-design in terms of impacts and success factors in developed countries and economies in transition or developing countries. The analysis shows the potentially added value of the application of a participatory approach to the design and redesign of healthcare services both at different levels of the healthcare organization and in the contexts of developed countries and economies in transition or developing countries. The evidence also highlights potentialities and critical success factors of the application of co-design in healthcare services redesign.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.