ArticleCureus2023
Diagnosis of Endometriosis by Transvaginal Ultrasound: An Online Survey of Gynecologists Practising in Greece.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global trends in the uptake of specialist diagnostic ultrasound and MRI scans for endometriosis: An international cross-sectional survey.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Endometriosis Imaging Diagnosis Beyond Specialized Centers: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Surgical Reconstruction of Abdominal Wall Endometriosis Post-Cesarean Section: A Monocentric Experience of a Rare Pathology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical Implications of Extracellular Vesicles in Endometriosis: A Systematic Review.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis and assessment of endometriosis by transvaginal ultrasound scan (TVS) can be challenging. We performed an online survey of specialist gynecologists who perform TVS on a regular basis regarding their views as well as clinical experience on the use of TVS in the diagnosis of endometrioma and deep endometriosis (DE). We collected 64 responses. Sixty-one participants (95.31%) answered that they can confidently diagnose endometrioma by TVS "always" or "most of the time". With the exception of DE of the recto-vaginal septum/posterior vaginal vault, for all other DE locations, more than 50% of participants felt that they can "rarely" or "never" diagnose it by TVS in their own clinical practice. Forty-two participants (65.6%) stated that additional, specialized training is required for the diagnosis of endometrioma. When asked about a diagnosis of DE, 58 participants (90.6%) felt that the same is required. The only statistically significant association was between the number of TVSs performed per year and the clinician's ability to diagnose bowel DE in their practice. The answers to all other questions did not differ significantly based on professional status, years of experience post-residency, or number of TVSs per year. Our results demonstrate the delayed adoption of novel diagnostic approaches in endometriosis and confirm the urgent need for specialized ultrasound training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.