ArticlePLOS global public health2023
Racial disparities in nephrectomy and mortality among patients with renal cell carcinoma: Findings from SEER.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Racial/ethnic differences in time to nephrectomy and its association with cancer-specific mortality in localized renal cell carcinoma.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Survival Differences of Localized Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma in African Americans vs. European Americans.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Prognostic factors and nomogram development for survival in renal cell carcinoma patients with multiple primary cancers: a retrospective study.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Racial-Ethnic Comparisons in Surgical Treatment and Outcomes of Non-Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer in an Equal Access Health System.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess racial differences in the receipt of nephrectomy in patients diagnosed RCC in the US. MATERIALS AND
methods2005 to 2015 data from the SEER database was analyzed and 70,059 patients with RCC were identified. We compared demographic and tumor characteristics between black patients and white patients. We applied logistic regression to assess the association between race and the odds of the receipt of nephrectomy. We also applied Cox proportional hazards model to assess the impact of race on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and all-cause mortality (ACM) in patients diagnosed with RCC in the US.
resultsBlack patients had 18% lower odds of receiving nephrectomy compared to white patients (p < 0.0001). The odds of the receipt of nephrectomy also reduced with age at diagnosis. In addition, patients with T3 stage had the greatest odds of receiving nephrectomy when compared to T1 (p < 0.0001). There was no difference in the risk of cancer-specific mortality between black patients and white patients; black patients had 27% greater odds of all-cause mortality than white patients (p < 0.0001). Patients who did not receive nephrectomy had a 42% and 35% higher risk of CSM and ACM respectively, when compared to patients who received nephrectomy.
conclusionsBlack patients diagnosed with RCC in the US have a greater ACM risk and are less likely than white patients to receive nephrectomy. Systemic changes are needed to eliminate racial disparity in the treatment and outcomes of RCC in the US.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.