Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37220125›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

In silico design and immunoinformatics analysis of a universal multi-epitope vaccine against monkeypox virus.

Samira Sanami, Shahin Nazarian, Sajjad Ahmad, Elham Raeisi, Muhammad Tahir Ul Qamar, Shahram Tahmasebian, Hamidreza Pazoki-Toroudi, Maryam Fazeli, Mahdi Ghatreh Samani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Design of B-Cell Multi-Epitope Subunit Vaccines AgainstTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Construction and evaluation of aFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Samira SanamiMedical Plants Research Center, Basic Health Sciences Institute, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
Shahin NazarianMing Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Sajjad AhmadDepartment of Health and Biological Sciences, Abasyn University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Elham RaeisiCellular and Molecular Research Center, Basic Health Sciences Institute, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
Muhammad Tahir Ul QamarDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biotechnology, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Shahram TahmasebianDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, School of Advanced Technologies, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
Hamidreza Pazoki-ToroudiPhysiology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maryam FazeliWHO Collaborating Center for Reference and Research on Rabies, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Mahdi Ghatreh SamaniClinical Biochemistry Research Center, Basic Health Sciences Institute, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-4369-1860
Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences · IRAbasyn University · PKGovernment College University, Faisalabad · PKIran University of Medical Sciences · IRPasteur Institute of Iran · IRUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monkeypox virus (MPXV) outbreaks have been reported in various countries worldwide; however, there is no specific vaccine against MPXV. In this study, therefore, we employed computational approaches to design a multi-epitope vaccine against MPXV. Initially, cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL), helper T lymphocyte (HTL), linear B lymphocytes (LBL) epitopes were predicted from the cell surface-binding protein and envelope protein A28 homolog, both of which play essential roles in MPXV pathogenesis. All of the predicted epitopes were evaluated using key parameters. A total of 7 CTL, 4 HTL, and 5 LBL epitopes were chosen and combined with appropriate linkers and adjuvant to construct a multi-epitope vaccine. The CTL and HTL epitopes of the vaccine construct cover 95.57% of the worldwide population. The designed vaccine construct was found to be highly antigenic, non-allergenic, soluble, and to have acceptable physicochemical properties. The 3D structure of the vaccine and its potential interaction with Toll-Like receptor-4 (TLR4) were predicted. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation confirmed the vaccine's high stability in complex with TLR4. Finally, codon adaptation and in silico cloning confirmed the high expression rate of the vaccine constructs in strain K12 of Escherichia coli (E. coli). These findings are very encouraging; however, in vitro and animal studies are needed to ensure the potency and safety of this vaccine candidate.

Indexed as

Monkeypox virusMpox, MonkeypoxEpitopesEscherichia coliMembrane ProteinsToll-Like Receptor 4EpitopesMembrane ProteinsToll-Like Receptor 4

Identifiers

PMID37220125
PMCPMC10205007
OpenAlexW4377862438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.