Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37219905›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Practice Patterns of Screening for Hydroxychloroquine Retinopathy in South Korea.

Jiyeong Kim, Ko Eun Kim, Ji Hong Kim, Seong Joon Ahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiyeong KimBiostatistical Consulting and Research Lab, Industry-University Cooperation Foundation, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ko Eun KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji Hong KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hanyang University Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seong Joon AhnDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hanyang University Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Practice patterns of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy screening have not yet been reported at a national level in South Korea. Objective: To investigate the practice patterns of timing and modality for hydroxychloroquine retinopathy screening in South Korea. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide population-based cohort study of patients in South Korea used data from the national Health Insurance Review and Assessment database. Patients at risk were identified as those who had initiated hydroxychloroquine therapy between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2020, and used it for 6 months or more. Patients were excluded if they underwent any of the 4 screening modalities recommended by the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) for other ophthalmic diseases prior to hydroxychloroquine use. The timing and modalities of screening used in baseline and monitoring examinations were assessed between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021, among patients at risk and long-term (≥5 years) users. Exposure: Adherence of baseline screening practices to the 2016 AAO recommendations (fundus examination within 1 year of drug use) was evaluated; adherence of monitoring examinations in year 5 was classified as appropriate (≥2 tests recommended by the AAO), unscreened (no test performed), and underscreened (insufficient number of tests). Main Outcomes and Measures: Timing of screening and modalities used at baseline and monitoring examinations. Results: A total of 65 406 patients at risk (mean [SD] age, 53.0 [15.5] years; 50 622 women [77.4%]) were included; 29 776 patients were long-term users (mean [SD] age, 50.1 [14.7] years; 24 898 women [83.6%]). Baseline screening was performed for 20.8% of the patients within 1 year, with a gradual increase from 16.6% in 2015 to 25.6% in 2021. Monitoring examinations, mostly using optical coherence tomography and/or visual field tests, were performed for only 13.5% of the long-term users in year 5 and for 31.6% of the long-term users after 5 years. Appropriate monitoring was performed for less than 10% of long-term users each year from 2015 to 2021; however, the percentage gradually increased over time. The percentage of patients undergoing any monitoring examination in year 5 was 2.3 times greater for those who had received baseline screening than for those who did not (27.4% vs 11.9%; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests there is an improving trend in retinopathy screening among hydroxychloroquine users in South Korea; however, most long-term users remained unscreened after 5 years of use. Baseline screening may be useful in reducing the number of unscreened long-term users.

Indexed as

HydroxychloroquineRetinal DiseasesAcademies and InstitutesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaHydroxychloroquine

Identifiers

PMID37219905
PMCPMC10208143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.