Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37219904›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Underreporting of Quality Measures and Associated Facility Characteristics and Racial Disparities in US Nursing Home Ratings.

Prachi Sanghavi, Zihan Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Prachi SanghaviBiological Sciences Division, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Zihan ChenBiological Sciences Division, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Chicago Department of Public Health · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Assessing and Improving Patient Safety Measurement in Nursing HomesR01HS026957 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SANGHAVI, PRACHI · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS026957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The US government rates nursing homes and reports the underlying quality measures on the Nursing Home Care Compare (NHCC) website. These measures are derived from facility-reported data, which research indicates to be substantially underreported. Objective: To assess the association between nursing home characteristics and reporting of major injury falls and pressure ulcers, which are 2 of 3 specific clinical outcomes reported by the NHCC website. Design, Setting, and Participants: This quality improvement study used hospitalization data for all Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. Hospital admission claims for major injury falls and pressure ulcers were linked with facility-reported Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments at the nursing home resident level. For each linked hospital claim, whether the nursing home had reported the event was determined and reporting rates were computed. The distribution of reporting across nursing homes and the associations between reporting and facility characteristics were examined. To assess whether nursing homes reported similarly on both measures, the association between reporting of major injury falls and pressure ulcers within a nursing home was estimated, and racial and ethnic disparities that might explain the observed associations were investigated. Small facilities and those that were not included in the sample continuously in each year of the study period were excluded. All analyses were performed throughout 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Two nursing home-level MDS reporting rates, stratified by long-stay vs short-stay population or by race and ethnicity, were used: fall reporting rate and pressure ulcer reporting rate. Results: The sample included 13 179 nursing homes where 131 000 residents (mean [SD] age, 81.9 [11.8] years; 93 010 females [71.0%]; 81.1% with White race and ethnicity) experienced major injury fall or pressure ulcer hospitalizations. There were 98 669 major injury fall hospitalizations, of which 60.0% were reported, and 39 894 stage 3 or 4 pressure ulcer hospitalizations, of which 67.7% were reported. Underreporting for both conditions was widespread, with 69.9% and 71.7% of nursing homes having reporting rates less than 80% for major injury fall and pressure ulcer hospitalizations, respectively. Lower reporting rates were associated with few facility characteristics other than racial and ethnic composition. Facilities with high vs low fall reporting rates had significantly more White residents (86.9% vs 73.3%), and facilities with high vs low pressure ulcer reporting rates had significantly fewer White residents (69.7% vs 74.9%). This pattern was retained within nursing homes, where the slope coefficient for the association between the 2 reporting rates was -0.42 (95% CI, -0.68 to -0.16). That is, nursing homes with more White residents had higher reporting rates for major injury falls and lower reporting rates for pressure ulcers. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study suggest widespread underreporting of major injury falls and pressure ulcers across US nursing homes, and underreporting was associated with the racial and ethnic composition of a facility. Alternative approaches to measuring quality need to be considered.

Indexed as

Pressure UlcerAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMedicareNursing HomesQuality Indicators, Health CareSkilled Nursing FacilitiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37219904
PMCPMC10208148
OpenAlexW4377564014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.