Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37219805›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023

Automatic segmentation of orbital wall from CT images via a thin wall region supervision-based multi-scale feature search network.

Jiangchang Xu, Dingzhong Zhang, Chunliang Wang, Huifang Zhou, Yinwei Li, Xiaojun Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiangchang XuInstitute of Biomedical Manufacturing and Life Quality Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, Room 925, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Dongchuan Road 800, Minhang District, Shanghai, 200240, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3187-888X
Dingzhong ZhangInstitute of Biomedical Manufacturing and Life Quality Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, Room 925, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Dongchuan Road 800, Minhang District, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Chunliang WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Huifang ZhouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yinwei LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. dr_yinwei_li@foxmail.com.
Xiaojun ChenInstitute of Biomedical Manufacturing and Life Quality Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, Room 925, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Dongchuan Road 800, Minhang District, Shanghai, 200240, China. xiaojunchen@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0298-4491

Funding

Cross disciplinary Research Fund of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong university School of Medicine0 JYJC202115National Natural Science Foundation of China 81971709National Natural Science Foundation of China 82011530141National Natural Science Foundation of China M-0019Shanghai Jiao Tong University Foundation on Medical and Technological Joint Science Research YG2021QN72Shanghai Jiao Tong University Foundation on Medical and Technological Joint Science Research YG2021ZD21Shanghai Jiao Tong University Foundation on Medical and Technological Joint Science Research YG2022QN056Shanghai Jiao Tong University Foundation on Medical and Technological Joint Science Research YG2023ZD15Shanghai Jiao Tong University Foundation on Medical and Technological Joint Science Research YG2023ZD19SJTU Global Strategic Partnership Fund 2021 SJTU-HUJISJTU Global Strategic Partnership Fund 2023 SJTU-CORNELLthe Foundation of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 20490740700Translation Clinical R&D Project of Medical Robot of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine IMR-NPH202002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOrbital wall segmentation is critical for orbital measurement and reconstruction. However, the orbital floor and medial wall are made up of thin walls (TW) with low gradient values, making it difficult to segment the blurred areas of the CT images. Clinically, doctors have to manually repair the missing parts of TW, which is time-consuming and laborious.

methodsTo address these issues, this paper proposes an automatic orbital wall segmentation method based on TW region supervision using a multi-scale feature search network. First of all, in the encoding branch, the densely connected atrous spatial pyramid pooling based on the residual connection is adopted to achieve a multi-scale feature search. Then, for feature enhancement, multi-scale up-sampling and residual connection are applied to perform skip connection of features in multi-scale convolution. Finally, we explore a strategy for improving the loss function based on the TW region supervision, which effectively increases the TW region segmentation accuracy.

resultsThe test results show that the proposed network performs well in terms of automatic segmentation. For the whole orbital wall region, the Dice coefficient (Dice) of segmentation accuracy reaches 96.086 ± 1.049%, the Intersection over Union (IOU) reaches 92.486 ± 1.924%, and the 95% Hausdorff distance (HD) reaches 0.509 ± 0.166 mm. For the TW region, the Dice reaches 91.470 ± 1.739%, the IOU reaches 84.327 ± 2.938%, and the 95% HD reaches 0.481 ± 0.082 mm. Compared with other segmentation networks, the proposed network improves the segmentation accuracy while filling the missing parts in the TW region.

conclusionIn the proposed network, the average segmentation time of each orbital wall is only 4.05 s, obviously improving the segmentation efficiency of doctors. In the future, it may have a practical significance in clinical applications such as preoperative planning for orbital reconstruction, orbital modeling, orbital implant design, and so on.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedOrbitTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerAutomatic segmentationDeep learningOrbital reconstructionOrbital wall segmentation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.