Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37219783›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2023

Robotic-assisted surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a long but safe learning curve.

Sophie Zaepfel, Raluca Marcovei, Elena Fernandez-de-Sevilla, Isabelle Sourrouille, Charles Honore, Maximiliano Gelli, Matthieu Faron, Leonor Benhaim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie ZaepfelDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France.
Raluca MarcoveiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France.
Elena Fernandez-de-SevillaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France.
Isabelle SourrouilleDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France.
Charles HonoreDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France.
Maximiliano GelliDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France.
Matthieu FaronDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France.
Leonor BenhaimDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France. leonorbenhaim@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3948-4156
Institut Gustave Roussy · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of robotic-assisted procedures for rectal cancer is rising. The risk of this procedure when performed by surgeon with limited robotic experience is unknown and the precise duration of the learning curve debated. We, therefore, aimed to analyze the learning curve and its related safety in a single center before the development of mentoring programs. We prospectively recorded all robotic procedures performed for colorectal cancer between 2015 and 2020 by a single surgeon. Operative times for partial and total proctectomy were analyzed. The learning curve was defined by comparison with the standard duration of the laparoscopic procedure performed in expert centers (published in GRECCAR 5 and GRECCAR 6 trials) and calculated using a cumulative summation for learning curve test (LC-CUSUM). Among the 174 patients operated for colorectal cancer, we analyzed the outcomes of the 89 patients operated by partial and total robotic proctectomy. To reach repeatedly the same surgical duration as laparoscopic procedure for partial or complete proctectomy, the LC-CUSUM identified a learning curve of 57 patients. A severe morbidity in this population, defined by Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ 3, was observed in 15 cases (16.8%) with an anastomotic leak rate of 13.5%. The rate of completeness of mesorectal excision was 90% and the mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 15 (± 9). Using operative time as end-point, the learning curve of rectal cancer robotic surgery identified a cut-off of 57 patients. The technic remained safe with acceptable morbidity and oncological outcomes.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRectal NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansLearning CurveRectumRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeLC-CUSUMLearning curveProctectomyRectal cancerRobotic-assisted surgeryTraining program

Identifiers

PMID37219783
OpenAlexW4377564831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.