Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37219755›Full record

ReviewAging clinical and experimental research2023

Measuring health-related quality of life in sarcopenia: summary of the SarQoL psychometric properties.

Charlotte Beaudart, Jean-Yves Reginster, Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan, Ivan Bautmans, Jürgen Bauer, Nansa Burlet, Matteo Cesari, Antonio Cherubini, Cyrus Cooper, Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft and 12 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cluster randomized trial of reablement strategies targeting sarcopenia (ReStart-S) in long-term care settings.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Prevention of Sarcopenia.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  13. Evaluating the SarQoLHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Sarcopenia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Charlotte BeaudartDivision of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, WHO Collaborating Center for Public Health Aspects of Musculo-Skeletal Health and Ageing, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium. c.beaudart@uliege.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0827-5303
Jean-Yves ReginsterDivision of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, WHO Collaborating Center for Public Health Aspects of Musculo-Skeletal Health and Ageing, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli ThiyagarajanDepartment of Ageing and Life Course, WHO, Geneve, Switzerland.
Ivan BautmansFrailty in Ageing Research Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Jürgen BauerCenter for Geriatric Medicine and Network Aging Research (NAR), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nansa BurletDivision of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, WHO Collaborating Center for Public Health Aspects of Musculo-Skeletal Health and Ageing, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Matteo CesariDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Antonio CherubiniGeriatria, Accettazione geriatrica e Centro di ricerca per l'invecchiamento, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Cyrus CooperMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Alfonso J Cruz-JentoftServicio de Geriatría. Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.
Bess Dawson-HughesJean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Roger A FieldingNutrition, Exercise Physiology and Sarcopenia Laboratory, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, USA.
Nicholas C HarveyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Francesco LandiFondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Andrea LaslopScientific Office, Austrian Medicines and Medical Devices Agency, Vienna, Austria.
Stefania MaggiCNR Aging Branch-IN, Padua, Italy.
Beatriz Montero-ErrasquinServicio de Geriatría. Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.
Prieto Yerro María ConcepciónAgencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios, Madrid, Spain.
Yves RollandGérontopôle de Toulouse, Institut du Vieillissement, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse, CERPOP UMR 1295, University of Toulouse III, Inserm, Toulouse, France.
René RizzoliService of Bone Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Marjolein VisserDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and the Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Olivier BruyèreDivision of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, WHO Collaborating Center for Public Health Aspects of Musculo-Skeletal Health and Ageing, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400491Medical Research Council G0601019Medical Research Council MC_PC_21000Medical Research Council MC_PC_21001Medical Research Council MC_PC_21003Medical Research Council MC_PC_21022Medical Research Council MC_U147585819Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_U147585827Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1015Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/2Medical Research Council MR/J000094/1World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient perspectives are now widely recognized as a key element in the evaluation of health interventions. Therefore, the provision of specific and validated Patient Reported Outcome Measures that emphasize the lived experience of patients suffering from specific diseases is very important. In the field of sarcopenia, the only validated specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument available is the Sarcopenia Quality of Life questionnaire (SarQoL). This self-administrated HRQoL questionnaire, developed in 2015, consists of 55 items arranged into 22 questions and has currently been translated into 35 languages. Nineteen validation studies performed on SarQoL have consensually confirmed the capacity of SarQoL to detect difference in HRQoL between older people with and without sarcopenia, its reliability and its validity. Two further observational studies have also indicated its responsiveness to change. A short form SarQoL, including only 14 items has further been developed and validated to reduce the potential burden of administration. Research on the psychometric properties of SarQoL questionnaire is still encouraged as the responsiveness to change of SarQoL has not yet been measured in the context of interventional studies, as limited prospective data currently exist and as there is still not cut-off score to define a low HRQoL. In addition, SarQoL has mainly been used in community-dwelling older individuals with sarcopenia and would benefit to be studied in other types of populations. This review aims to provide to researchers, clinicians, regulators, pharmaceutical industries and other stakeholders a clear summary of comprehensive evidence on the SarQoL questionnaire published up to January 2023Query.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSarcopeniaAgedHumansProspective StudiesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesHRQoLPsychometric propertiesQuality of lifeSarcopeniaValidation

Identifiers

PMID37219755
PMCPMC10363087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.