ArticleThe ultrasound journal2023
Determinants of point-of-care ultrasound lung sliding amplitude in mechanically ventilated patients.
Article in The ultrasound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07351201 (The Effect of Head and Neck Positioning on Lung Sliding), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Head and Neck Positioning on Lung Sliding: A Bedside Comparison at 0°, 20°, and 40° in Healthy Volunteer
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Tracking pleural sliding motion to assess lung overdistention using an open source algorithm: a proof-of-concept study on lung ultrasound scans.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Head-to-toe bedside ultrasound for adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Intensive care medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough lung sliding seen by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is known to be affected to varying degrees by different physiologic and pathologic processes, it is typically only reported qualitatively in the critical care setting. Lung sliding amplitude quantitatively expresses the amount of pleural movement seen by POCUS but its determinants in mechanically ventilated patients are largely unknown.
methodsThis was a single-center, prospective, observational pilot study examining 40 hemithoraces in 20 adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Each subject had lung sliding amplitude measured in both B-mode and by pulsed wave Doppler at their bilateral lung apices and bases. Differences in lung sliding amplitude were correlated with anatomical location (apex vs base) as well as physiologic parameters including positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), driving pressure, tidal volume and the ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO
resultsPOCUS lung sliding amplitude was significantly lower at the lung apex compared to the lung base in both B-mode (3.6 ± 2.0 mm vs 8.6 ± 4.3 mm; p < 0.001) and the pulsed wave Doppler mode (10.3 ± 4.6 cm/s vs 13.9 ± 5.5 cm/s; p < 0.001) corresponding to expected distribution of ventilation to the lung bases. Inter-rater reliability of B-mode measurements was excellent (ICC = 0.91) and distance traversed in B-mode had a significant positive correlation with pleural line velocity (r
conclusionPOCUS lung sliding amplitude was significantly lower at the lung apex than the lung base in mechanically ventilated patients. This was true when using both B-mode and pulsed wave Doppler. Lung sliding amplitude did not correlate with PEEP, driving pressure, tidal volume or PaO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.