Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37219718›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2023

Sensitivity to word endings as probabilistic orthographic cues to lexical stress among English as second language learners.

Jinglei Ren, Min Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jinglei RenDepartment of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Min WangDepartment of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA. minwang@umd.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assigning stress to polysyllabic words is a crucial aspect of reading aloud in English. Previous research demonstrated that native English speakers are sensitive to word endings as probabilistic orthographic cues to stress assignment. However, little is known about if second language (L2) learners of English are sensitive to word endings as cues to lexical stress. The current study investigated whether native Chinese-speakers learning English as a second language (ESL) are sensitive to word endings as probabilistic orthographic cues to lexical stress. Our ESL learners demonstrated sensitivity to word endings as cues in a stress-assignment task and a naming task. With the increase in language proficiency, ESL learners responded more accurately in the stress-assignment task. Moreover, stress position and language proficiency moderated the strength of the sensitivity, with a trochaic bias and better proficiency leading to better sensitivity in the stress-assignment task. However, as language proficiency increased, participants' naming speed became faster in iambic but slower in trochaic patterns, reflecting the learners' fledgling knowledge about the specific stress patterns associated with varying orthographic cues, especially in a demanding naming task. Taken together, the evidence from our ESL learners fits in the proposed statistical learning mechanism, that is, L2 learners are able to implicitly extract statistical regularities from linguistic materials, the orthographic cues to lexical stress in our study. Stress position and language proficiency both play a role in developing this sensitivity.

Indexed as

CuesMultilingualismHumansLanguageLearningReadingLexical stressOrthographic cuesSecond languageStatistical learningWord endings

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.