Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37219637›Full record

Observational studyBreast cancer research and treatment2023

Value of total tumor load as a clinical and pathological factor in the prognosis of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment. Comparison of three populations with three different surgical approaches: NEOVATTL Pro 3 Study.

María Dolores Martín-Salvago, Magdalena Sancho, M Ángeles López-García, Alicia Cano Jiménez, Ana Pérez-Luque, Lina Alfaro, Begoña Vieites

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

María Dolores Martín-SalvagoDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Universitario de Jaén, Jaén, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4366-2587
Magdalena SanchoDepartment of Pathology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8761-9081
M Ángeles López-GarcíaDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0608-9830
Alicia Cano JiménezMedical Oncology Department. Hospital, Universitario de Jaén, Jaén, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1582-493X
Ana Pérez-LuqueDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain.
Lina AlfaroDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain.
Begoña VieitesDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain. mb.vieites.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2611-8501

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to compare the prognosis in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) in three populations of women with breast cancer (BC) treated with neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST) in which axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed based on different total tumor load (TTL) thresholds in the sentinel nodes.

methodsThis was an observational, retrospective study carried out in three Spanish centers. Data from patients with infiltrating BC who underwent BC surgery after NAST and intraoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) performed by One Step Nucleic acid Amplification (OSNA) technique during 2017 and 2018 were analyzed. ALND was performed according to the protocol of each center, based on three different TTL cut-offs (TTL > 250, TTL > 5000, and TTL > 15,000 CK19-mRNA copies/μL for centers 1, 2, and 3, respectively).

resultsA total of 157 BC patients were included in the study. No significant differences in DFS were observed between centers (Hazard ratio [HR] center 2 vs 1: 0.77; p = 0.707; HR center 3 vs 1: 0.83; p = 0.799). Patients with ALND had a shorter DFS (HR 2.43; p = 0.136), albeit not statistically significant. Patients with a triple negative subtype had a worse prognosis than those with other molecular subtypes (HR 2.82; p = 0.056).

conclusionNo significant differences in DFS were observed between three centers with different surgical approaches to ALND based on different TTL cut-offs in patients with BC after NAST. These results suggest that restricting ALND to those patients with TTL ≥ 15,000 copies/μL is a reliable approximation, avoiding unnecessary morbidities caused by ALND.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAxillaFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyTumor BurdenAxillary lymphadenectomyBreast cancerNeoadjuvant systemic treatmentSentinel lymph node biopsyTotal tumor load

Identifiers

PMID37219637
PMCPMC10241680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.