Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37219619›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Neural network algorithm for detection of erosions and ankylosis on CT of the sacroiliac joints: multicentre development and validation of diagnostic accuracy.

Thomas Van Den Berghe, Danilo Babin, Min Chen, Martijn Callens, Denim Brack, Helena Maes, Jan Lievens, Marie Lammens, Maxime Van Sumere, Lieve Morbée and 16 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. A deep neural network for MRI spinal inflammation in axial spondyloarthritis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Thomas Van Den BergheDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. thovdnbe.vandenberghe@ugent.be.
Danilo BabinDepartment of Telecommunication and Information Processing - Image Processing and Interpretation (TELIN-IPI), Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University - IMEC, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Min ChenDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518036, China.
Martijn CallensDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Denim BrackDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Helena MaesDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Jan LievensDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Marie LammensDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Maxime Van SumereDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Lieve MorbéeDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Simon HautekeeteDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Stijn SchattemanDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Tom JacobsDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Willem-Jan ThooftDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Nele HerregodsDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Wouter HuysseDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Jacob L JaremkoDepartment of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging and Rheumatology, University of Alberta, 8440 122 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada.
Robert LambertDepartment of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging and Rheumatology, University of Alberta, 8440 122 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada.
Walter MaksymowychDepartment of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging and Rheumatology, University of Alberta, 8440 122 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada.
Frederiek LalooDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Xenofon BaraliakosRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Claudiusstraße 45, 44649, Herne, Germany.
Ann-Sophie De CraemerDepartment of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Philippe CarronDepartment of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Filip Van den BoschDepartment of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Dirk ElewautDepartment of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Lennart JansDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BEUniversity of Alberta · CAVIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research · BEGhent University · BEPeking University Shenzhen Hospital · CNRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet · DEVlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie · BE

Funding

European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology Young Researchers Grant 2022Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Fundamenteel Klinisch Mandaat 2022-2027Koning Boudewijnstichting Scientific Research on Rheumatology Fund 2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of a deep learning network for detection of structural lesions of sacroiliitis on multicentre pelvic CT scans.

methodsPelvic CT scans of 145 patients (81 female, 121 Ghent University/24 Alberta University, 18-87 years old, mean 40 ± 13 years, 2005-2021) with a clinical suspicion of sacroiliitis were retrospectively included. After manual sacroiliac joint (SIJ) segmentation and structural lesion annotation, a U-Net for SIJ segmentation and two separate convolutional neural networks (CNN) for erosion and ankylosis detection were trained. In-training validation and tenfold validation testing (U-Net-n = 10 × 58; CNN-n = 10 × 29) on a test dataset were performed to assess performance on a slice-by-slice and patient level (dice coefficient/accuracy/sensitivity/specificity/positive and negative predictive value/ROC AUC). Patient-level optimisation was applied to increase the performance regarding predefined statistical metrics. Gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM++) heatmap explainability analysis highlighted image parts with statistically important regions for algorithmic decisions.

resultsRegarding SIJ segmentation, a dice coefficient of 0.75 was obtained in the test dataset. For slice-by-slice structural lesion detection, a sensitivity/specificity/ROC AUC of 95%/89%/0.92 and 93%/91%/0.91 were obtained in the test dataset for erosion and ankylosis detection, respectively. For patient-level lesion detection after pipeline optimisation for predefined statistical metrics, a sensitivity/specificity of 95%/85% and 82%/97% were obtained for erosion and ankylosis detection, respectively. Grad-CAM++  explainability analysis highlighted cortical edges as focus for pipeline decisions.

conclusionsAn optimised deep learning pipeline, including an explainability analysis, detects structural lesions of sacroiliitis on pelvic CT scans with excellent statistical performance on a slice-by-slice and patient level. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: An optimised deep learning pipeline, including a robust explainability analysis, detects structural lesions of sacroiliitis on pelvic CT scans with excellent statistical metrics on a slice-by-slice and patient level. KEY POINTS: • Structural lesions of sacroiliitis can be detected automatically in pelvic CT scans. • Both automatic segmentation and disease detection yield excellent statistical outcome metrics. • The algorithm takes decisions based on cortical edges, rendering an explainable solution.

Indexed as

AnkylosisSacroiliitisAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective StudiesSacroiliac JointTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultArtificial intelligenceDeep learningSacroiliac jointSacroiliitisSpondyloarthropathies

Identifiers

PMID37219619
OpenAlexW4377564311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.