Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37219579›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2023

Comparing derivatization reagents for quantitative LC-MS/MS analysis of a variety of vitamin D metabolites.

Anastasia Alexandridou, Pascal Schorr, Dietrich A Volmer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Quantification of 24,25-Dihydroxyvitamin DInternational journal of analytical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anastasia AlexandridouBioanalytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Humboldt University Berlin, Brook-Taylor-Str. 2, 12489, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3633-4021
Pascal SchorrBioanalytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Humboldt University Berlin, Brook-Taylor-Str. 2, 12489, Berlin, Germany.
Dietrich A VolmerBioanalytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Humboldt University Berlin, Brook-Taylor-Str. 2, 12489, Berlin, Germany. Dietrich.Volmer@hu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2820-1480
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft VO 1355/5-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study systematically compares the sensitivity and selectivity of the analysis of multiple vitamin D metabolites after chemical derivatization using different reagents for liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Generally, chemical derivatization is applied to vitamin D metabolites to increase the ionization efficiency, which is particularly important for very low abundant metabolites. Derivatization can also improve the selectivity of the LC separation. A wide variety of derivatization reagents has been reported in recent years, but information on their relative performance and applicability to different vitamin D metabolites is, unfortunately, not available in the literature. To fill this gap, we investigated vitamin D

Indexed as

Tandem Mass SpectrometryVitamin DCalcifediolChromatography, LiquidIndicators and ReagentsCalcifediolIndicators and ReagentsVitamin D25-Hydroxyvitamin D3Chemical derivatizationElectrosprayEpimersLC–MS/MSVitamin D3 metabolites

Identifiers

PMID37219579
PMCPMC10352403
OpenAlexW4377564574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.