Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37219554›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2023

Reducing Opioid Use for Chronic Pain With a Group-Based Intervention: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Harbinder K Sandhu, Katie Booth, Andrea D Furlan, Jane Shaw, Dawn Carnes, Stephanie J C Taylor, Charles Abraham, Sharisse Alleyne, Shyam Balasubramanian, Lauren Betteley and 16 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 12 institutions in 5 countries.

Harbinder K SandhuWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Katie BoothWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Andrea D FurlanToronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jane ShawDepartment of Pain Medicine, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Dawn CarnesWolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Stephanie J C TaylorWolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Charles AbrahamSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Sharisse AlleyneWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Shyam BalasubramanianDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Lauren BetteleyWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Kirstie L HaywoodDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Cynthia P Iglesias-UrrutiaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Sheeja KrishnanDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Ranjit LallWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Andrea MancaCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Dipesh MistryWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Sian NewtonWolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Jennifer NoyesDepartment of Pain Medicine, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Vivien NicholsWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Emma PadfieldWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Anisur RahmanCentre for Rheumatology Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kate SeersDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Nicole K Y TangDepartment of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Colin TysallUniversity/User Teaching and Research Action Partnership, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Sam EldabeDepartment of Pain Medicine, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Martin UnderwoodWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
University of Warwick · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBJames Cook University Hospital · GBUniversity of York · GBAalborg University · DKCoventry University · GBDeakin University · AUHemel Hempstead Hospital · GBInstitute for Work & Health · CAJanssen (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity Hospital Coventry · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Opioid use for chronic nonmalignant pain can be harmful. Objective: To test whether a multicomponent, group-based, self-management intervention reduced opioid use and improved pain-related disability compared with usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicentered, randomized clinical trial of 608 adults taking strong opioids (buprenorphine, dipipanone, morphine, diamorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, oxycodone, papaveretum, pentazocine, pethidine, tapentadol, and tramadol) to treat chronic nonmalignant pain. The study was conducted in 191 primary care centers in England between May 17, 2017, and January 30, 2019. Final follow-up occurred March 18, 2020. Intervention: Participants were randomized 1:1 to either usual care or 3-day-long group sessions that emphasized skill-based learning and education, supplemented by 1-on-1 support delivered by a nurse and lay person for 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: The 2 primary outcomes were Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference Short Form 8a (PROMIS-PI-SF-8a) score (T-score range, 40.7-77; 77 indicates worst pain interference; minimal clinically important difference, 3.5) and the proportion of participants who discontinued opioids at 12 months, measured by self-report. Results: Of 608 participants randomized (mean age, 61 years; 362 female [60%]; median daily morphine equivalent dose, 46 mg [IQR, 25 to 79]), 440 (72%) completed 12-month follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference in PROMIS-PI-SF-8a scores between the 2 groups at 12-month follow-up (-4.1 in the intervention and -3.17 in the usual care groups; between-group difference: mean difference, -0.52 [95% CI, -1.94 to 0.89]; P = .15). At 12 months, opioid discontinuation occurred in 65 of 225 participants (29%) in the intervention group and 15 of 208 participants (7%) in the usual care group (odds ratio, 5.55 [95% CI, 2.80 to 10.99]; absolute difference, 21.7% [95% CI, 14.8% to 28.6%]; P < .001). Serious adverse events occurred in 8% (25/305) of the participants in the intervention group and 5% (16/303) of the participants in the usual care group. The most common serious adverse events were gastrointestinal (2% in the intervention group and 0% in the usual care group) and locomotor/musculoskeletal (2% in the intervention group and 1% in the usual care group). Four people (1%) in the intervention group received additional medical care for possible or probable symptoms of opioid withdrawal (shortness of breath, hot flushes, fever and pain, small intestinal bleed, and an overdose suicide attempt). Conclusions and Relevance: In people with chronic pain due to nonmalignant causes, compared with usual care, a group-based educational intervention that included group and individual support and skill-based learning significantly reduced patient-reported use of opioids, but had no effect on perceived pain interference with daily life activities. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN49470934.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidChronic PainOpioid-Related DisordersFemaleGroup ProcessesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMorphineSelf-ManagementTramadolAnalgesics, OpioidMorphineTramadol

Identifiers

PMID37219554
PMCPMC10208139
OpenAlexW4377564077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.