Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37219339›Full record

ReviewHealth services research2023

Advancing healthcare equity through dissemination and implementation science.

Ana A Baumann, Rachel C Shelton, Shiriki Kumanyika, Debra Haire-Joshu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Designing and Delivering a Dissemination Programme With Co-Researchers With Intellectual Disabilities.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Radical Healing Approaches For Black Maternal Health: A Critical Review.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana A BaumannDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4523-0147
Rachel C SheltonDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA.
Shiriki KumanyikaDrexel Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Debra Haire-JoshuBrown School of Public Health and School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
PHARMacist and Community Health Support to Optimize Medications After Trauma Surgery (PHARM-C)P50MH122351 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Joanna Abraham · 2021 to 2026
$10.8M
Supplement: Implementation Research Strategies for Heart, Lung, and Blood Co-morbidities in People Living with HIV - Research Coordinating CenterU24HL154426 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DAVILA-ROMAN, VICTOR G., GENG, ELVIN H. · 2020 to 2024
$9.5M
Washington University Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control (WU-ISCCC)P50CA244431 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNSON, ROSS C, COLDITZ, GRAHAM A. · 2019 to 2023
$8.0M
The Implementation of Cognitive Screening and Educational Support to Improve Outcomes of Adolescents and Young Adults with Sickle Cell Disease: From Clinic to the Community and BackU01HL133994 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KING, ALLISON A · 2016 to 2021
$5.2M
Research ProgramP50CA244690 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHULMAN, LAWRENCE N. · 2020 to 2024
$4.9M
Promoting healthy weight across the pregnancy and postpartum period through dissemination of an evidence based interventionR01DK121475 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HAIRE-JOSHU, DEBRA, TABAK, RACHEL G · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
Enhancing Cardiovascular Health Equity in Mothers and Children Through Home VisitingUG3HL162970 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DAVILA-ROMAN, VICTOR G., HAIRE-JOSHU, DEBRA · 2022 to 2023
$1.4M
Pathways to integrate maternal-child health and nutrition interventions to transform equity and human potentialU01OD033239 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS · PI BUCCINI, GABRIELA · 2021 to 2021
$1.1M
Mentored Education for Dissemination and Implementation Science (MEDIS) ProgramR25DK123008 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNSON, ROSS C, HAIRE-JOSHU, DEBRA · 2020 to 2024
$1.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244431NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244690NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL133994NHLBI NIH HHS U24 HL154426NHLBI NIH HHS UG3 HL162970NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK121475NIDDK NIH HHS R25 DK123008NIH HHS U01 OD033239NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH122351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide guiding principles and recommendations for how approaches from the field of dissemination and implementation (D&I) science can advance healthcare equity. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY

settingThis article, part of a special issue sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), is based on an outline drafted to support proceedings of the 2022 AHRQ Health Equity Summit and further revised to reflect input from Summit attendees. STUDY

designThis is a narrative review of the current and potential applications of D&I approaches for understanding and advancing healthcare equity, followed by discussion and feedback with Summit attendees. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsWe identified major themes in narrative and systematic reviews related to D&I science, healthcare equity, and their intersections. Based on our expertise, and supported by synthesis of published studies, we propose recommendations for how D&I science is relevant for advancing healthcare equity. We used iterative discussions internally and at the Summit to refine preliminary findings and recommendations. PRINCIPAL

findingsWe identified four guiding principles and three D&I science domains with strong promise for accelerating progress toward healthcare equity. We present eight recommendations and more than 60 opportunities for action by practitioners, healthcare leaders, policy makers, and researchers.

conclusionsPromising areas for D&I science to impact healthcare equity include the following: attention to equity in the development and delivery of evidence-based interventions; the science of adaptation; de-implementation of low-value care; monitoring equity markers; organizational policies for healthcare equity; improving the economic evaluation of implementation; policy and dissemination research; and capacity building.

Indexed as

Health EquityImplementation ScienceDelivery of Health CareHumansdissemination and implementation scienceevidence-based interventionhealthcare equityhealth equityracismsocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID37219339
PMCPMC10684051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.