Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37218913›Full record

ArticlePathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology2023

Advantages of Multiposition Scanning in Echocardiographic Assessment of the Severity of Discordant Aortic Stenosis.

Elena Zelikovna Golukhova, Inessa Viktorovna Slivneva, Inga Yur'evna Farulova, Ivan Ivanovich Skopin, Damir Ildarovich Marapov, Dar'ya Vladimirovna Murysova, Yuliya Dmitrievna Pirushkina, Irina Vasilyevna Volkovskaya

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elena Zelikovna GolukhovaA.N. Bakulev National Medical Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 121552 Moscow, Russia.
Inessa Viktorovna SlivnevaDepartment of Cardiovascular and Comorbid Pathology, A.N. Bakulev National Medical Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 121552 Moscow, Russia.
Inga Yur'evna FarulovaDepartment of Reconstructive Surgery of Heart Valves and Coronary Arteries, A.N. Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 121552 Moscow, Russia.
Ivan Ivanovich SkopinDepartment of Reconstructive Surgery of Heart Valves and Coronary Arteries, A.N. Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 121552 Moscow, Russia.
Damir Ildarovich MarapovDepartment of Public Health, Economics and Health Care Management, Kazan State Medical Academy-Branch Campus of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 420012 Kazan, Russia.
Dar'ya Vladimirovna MurysovaDepartment of Reconstructive Surgery of Heart Valves and Coronary Arteries, A.N. Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 121552 Moscow, Russia.
Yuliya Dmitrievna PirushkinaDepartment of Cardiology and Functional Diagnostics, A.N. Bakulev National Medical Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 121552 Moscow, Russia.
Irina Vasilyevna VolkovskayaPolyclinic Department of the Institute of Coronary and Vascular Surgery, A.N. Bakulev National Medical Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 121552 Moscow, Russia.
Bakulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery Russian Academy of Medical Sciences · RUMinistry of Health of the Russian Federation · RURussian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aim of the studyThe aim of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of severity of discordant aortic stenosis (AS) assessment using multiposition scanning and the standard apical window. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll patients (

resultsBased on the comparative analysis of transvalvular flow velocities obtained from multiposition scanning, the concordance group showed agreement between the velocity and calculated parameters. We observed an increase in the mean transvalvular pressure gradient (ΔP

conclusionUnderestimation of flow velocity and overestimation of AVA using the apical window may lead to misclassification of AS. The use of RPW helps to match the degree of AS severity with the velocity characteristics and reduce the number of low-gradient AS cases.

Indexed as

aortic root angulationdiscordant aortic stenosismultiple-view scanning of aortic valvereclassification of aortic stenosisright parasternal windowtransthoracic echocardiographyTTE

Identifiers

PMID37218913
PMCPMC10204481
OpenAlexW4367181228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.