Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37218905›Full record

ArticleMethods and protocols2023

Guidelines to Analyze Preclinical Studies Using Perinatal Derivatives.

Ana Salomé Pires, Sveva Bollini, Maria Filomena Botelho, Ingrid Lang-Olip, Peter Ponsaerts, Carolina Balbi, Anna Lange-Consiglio, Mathilde Fénelon, Slavko Mojsilović, Ekaterine Berishvili and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods and protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ana Salomé PiresCoimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR) Area of Environment, Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Institute of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7994-4650
Sveva BolliniDepartment of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1076-0823
Maria Filomena BotelhoCoimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR) Area of Environment, Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Institute of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7202-1650
Ingrid Lang-OlipDivision of Cell Biology, Histology, Embryology, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Peter PonsaertsLaboratory of Experimental Hematology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute (Vaxinfectio), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1892-6499
Carolina BalbiLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Cardiology, Istituto Cardiocentro Ticino, CH-6900 Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7394-1173
Anna Lange-ConsiglioDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (DIVAS), Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria, 10, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7748-3413
Mathilde FénelonINSERM U1026, University of Bordeaux, Tissue Bioengineering (BioTis), F-33076 Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6015-8983
Slavko MojsilovićGroup for Hematology and Stem Cells, Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-4399-6720
Ekaterine BerishviliLaboratory of Tissue Engineering and Organ Regeneration, University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7969-1937
Fausto CremonesiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (DIVAS), Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria, 10, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8399-4626
Maria GazouliDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Laboratory of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 27 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3295-6811
Diana BugarskiGroup for Hematology and Stem Cells, Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Alexandra GellhausDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, D-45147 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9506-4581
Halima KerdjoudjBiomatériaux et Inflammation en Site Osseux (BIOS), Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne, F-51097 Reims, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8072-9728
Andreina SchoeberleinDepartment of Obstetrics and Feto-maternal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6716-9551

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/04539/2020 and UIDP/04539/2020 (CIBB)University of Geneva Horizon 2020 Framework Program (VANGUARD 874700)University of Genova Curiosity Driven Grant "Triggering CARDIOmyocyte renewal by harnessing the STem cell pARa-crine potential (CARDIO-STAR)"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last 18 years have brought an increasing interest in the therapeutic use of perinatal derivatives (PnD). Preclinical studies used to assess the potential of PnD therapy include a broad range of study designs. The COST SPRINT Action (CA17116) aims to provide systematic and comprehensive reviews of preclinical studies for the understanding of the therapeutic potential and mechanisms of PnD in diseases and injuries that benefit from PnD therapy. Here we describe the publication search and data mining, extraction, and synthesis strategies employed to collect and prepare the published data selected for meta-analyses and reviews of the efficacy of PnD therapies for different diseases and injuries. A coordinated effort was made to prepare the data suitable to make statements for the treatment efficacy of the different types of PnD, routes, time points, and frequencies of administration, and the dosage based on clinically relevant effects resulting in clear increase, recovery or amelioration of the specific tissue or organ function. According to recently proposed guidelines, the harmonization of the nomenclature of PnD types will allow for the assessment of the most efficient treatments in various disease models. Experts within the COST SPRINT Action (CA17116), together with external collaborators, are doing the meta-analyses and reviews using the data prepared with the strategies presented here in the relevant disease or research fields. Our final aim is to provide standards to assess the safety and clinical benefit of PnD and to minimize redundancy in the use of animal models following the 3R principles for animal experimentation.

Indexed as

animal modelsconsensusdatabase searchperinatal derivativespreclinical studiesprotocol

Identifiers

PMID37218905
PMCPMC10204500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.