Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37218893›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2023

Implementation of Newborn Hearing Screening in Albania.

Andrea M L Bussé, Birkena Qirjazi, Allison R Mackey, Jan Kik, André Goedegebure, Hans L J Hoeve, Ervin Toçi, Enver Roshi, Gwen Carr, Martijn S Toll and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrea M L BusséDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Birkena QirjaziDepartment of Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases-Ophthalmology, University of Medicine of Tirana, 1000 Tirana, Albania.ORCID 0000-0002-8734-5938
Allison R MackeyCLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Jan KikDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4811-8038
André GoedegebureDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Hans L J HoeveDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ervin ToçiDepartment of Public Health, University of Medicine of Tirana, 1000 Tirana, Albania.ORCID 0000-0001-8740-059X
Enver RoshiDepartment of Public Health, University of Medicine of Tirana, 1000 Tirana, Albania.
Gwen CarrIndependent Consultant in Early Hearing Detection, Intervention and Family Centered Practice, Ribble Valley BB7 2RA, UK.
Martijn S TollDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Huibert J SimonszDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5899-6654
Erasmus MC · NLUniversity of Medicine Tirana · ALKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme 733352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newborn hearing screening (NHS) was implemented in Albania in four maternity hospitals in 2018 and 2019. Implementation outcome, screening outcome, and screening quality measures were evaluated. Infants were first screened by midwives and nurses before discharge from the maternity hospital and returned for follow-up screening. Acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, adoption, fidelity, coverage, attendance, and stepwise and final-referral rates were assessed by onsite observations, interviews, questionnaires, and a screening database. A post hoc analysis was performed to identify reasons for loss to follow up (LTFU) in a multivariate logistic regression. In total, 22,818 infants were born, of which 96.6% were screened. For the second screening step, 33.6% of infants were LTFU, 40.4% for the third, and 35.8% for diagnostic assessment. Twenty-two (0.1%) were diagnosed with hearing loss of ≥40 dB, six unilateral. NHS was appropriate and feasible: most infants are born in maternity hospitals, hence nurses and midwives could perform screening, and screening rooms and logistic support were supplied. Adoption among screeners was good. Referral rates decreased steadily, reflecting increasing skill. Occasionally, screening was repeated during a screening step, contrary to the protocol. NHS in Albania was implemented successfully, though LTFU was high. It is important to have effective data tracking and supervision throughout the screening.

Indexed as

Albaniafollow uphearing lossimplementation studyuniversal newborn hearing screening

Identifiers

PMID37218893
PMCPMC10204502
OpenAlexW4377564598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.