Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37218857›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology2023

Countermovement, Hurdle, and Box Jumps: Data-Driven Exercise Selection.

M Tino Janikov, Jan Pádecký, Valentin Doguet, James J Tufano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M Tino JanikovSport Sciences-Biomedical Department, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-4912-1001
Jan PádeckýSport Sciences-Biomedical Department, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic.
Valentin DoguetAtelier Maker®, 497 00 Doué-en-Anjou, France.
James J TufanoSport Sciences-Biomedical Department, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8325-0344

Funding

Charles University Cooperatio Program, research area SPOBCharles University SVV260599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apart from squat jumps, countermovement jumps (CMJ), and drop jumps, differences among other jump variations are not as well researched, making data-driven exercise selection difficult. To address this gap, this study compared selected concentric and eccentric jump parameters of maximal effort CMJ, hurdle jumps over 50 cm hurdle (HJ), and box jumps onto a 50 cm box (BJ). Twenty recreationally trained men (25.2 ± 3.5 years) performed 3 repetitions of CMJs, HJs, and BJs, each on separate days. The data were collected using force platforms and a linear position transducer. The mean of 3 trials of each jump variation was analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and Cohen's d. Countermovement depth was significantly greater (

Indexed as

exercise variationplyometric trainingstretch-shortening cycle

Identifiers

PMID37218857
PMCPMC10204452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.