Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37218794›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Object Grasp Control of a 3D Robot Arm by Combining EOG Gaze Estimation and Camera-Based Object Recognition.

Muhammad Syaiful Amri Bin Suhaimi, Kojiro Matsushita, Takahide Kitamura, Pringgo Widyo Laksono, Minoru Sasaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhammad Syaiful Amri Bin SuhaimiFaculty of Information and Communication Technology, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Jalan Universiti, Bandar Barat, Kampar 31900, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-8738-913X
Kojiro MatsushitaGraduate School of Engineering, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193, Japan.
Takahide KitamuraGraduate School of Engineering, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193, Japan.
Pringgo Widyo LaksonoGraduate School of Engineering, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0502-5453
Minoru SasakiGraduate School of Engineering, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7806-8492

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to quickly and stably achieve grasping objects with a 3D robot arm controlled by electrooculography (EOG) signals. A EOG signal is a biological signal generated when the eyeballs move, leading to gaze estimation. In conventional research, gaze estimation has been used to control a 3D robot arm for welfare purposes. However, it is known that the EOG signal loses some of the eye movement information when it travels through the skin, resulting in errors in EOG gaze estimation. Thus, EOG gaze estimation is difficult to point out the object accurately, and the object may not be appropriately grasped. Therefore, developing a methodology to compensate, for the lost information and increase spatial accuracy is important. This paper aims to realize highly accurate object grasping with a robot arm by combining EMG gaze estimation and the object recognition of camera image processing. The system consists of a robot arm, top and side cameras, a display showing the camera images, and an EOG measurement analyzer. The user manipulates the robot arm through the camera images, which can be switched, and the EOG gaze estimation can specify the object. In the beginning, the user gazes at the screen's center position and then moves their eyes to gaze at the object to be grasped. After that, the proposed system recognizes the object in the camera image via image processing and grasps it using the object centroid. The object selection is based on the object centroid closest to the estimated gaze position within a certain distance (threshold), thus enabling highly accurate object grasping. The observed size of the object on the screen can differ depending on the camera installation and the screen display state. Therefore, it is crucial to set the distance threshold from the object centroid for object selection. The first experiment is conducted to clarify the distance error of the EOG gaze estimation in the proposed system configuration. As a result, it is confirmed that the range of the distance error is 1.8-3.0 cm. The second experiment is conducted to evaluate the performance of the object grasping by setting two thresholds from the first experimental results: the medium distance error value of 2 cm and the maximum distance error value of 3 cm. As a result, it is found that the grasping speed of the 3 cm threshold is 27% faster than that of the 2 cm threshold due to more stable object selection.

Indexed as

EOGgaze estimationobject grasprobot armwelfare robot

Identifiers

PMID37218794
PMCPMC10204570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.