Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37218777›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

An Adaptive Sand Cat Swarm Algorithm Based on Cauchy Mutation and Optimal Neighborhood Disturbance Strategy.

Xing Wang, Qian Liu, Li Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xing WangSchool of Science, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710054, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6130-5789
Qian LiuSchool of Science, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710054, China.
Li ZhangSchool of Science, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China.

Funding

Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China 2021JM-320Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China 2023-JC-YB-023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sand cat swarm optimization algorithm (SCSO) keeps a potent and straightforward meta-heuristic algorithm derived from the distant sense of hearing of sand cats, which shows excellent performance in some large-scale optimization problems. However, the SCSO still has several disadvantages, including sluggish convergence, lower convergence precision, and the tendency to be trapped in the topical optimum. To escape these demerits, an adaptive sand cat swarm optimization algorithm based on Cauchy mutation and optimal neighborhood disturbance strategy (COSCSO) are provided in this study. First and foremost, the introduction of a nonlinear adaptive parameter in favor of scaling up the global search helps to retrieve the global optimum from a colossal search space, preventing it from being caught in a topical optimum. Secondly, the Cauchy mutation operator perturbs the search step, accelerating the convergence speed and improving the search efficiency. Finally, the optimal neighborhood disturbance strategy diversifies the population, broadens the search space, and enhances exploitation. To reveal the performance of COSCSO, it was compared with alternative algorithms in the CEC2017 and CEC2020 competition suites. Furthermore, COSCSO is further deployed to solve six engineering optimization problems. The experimental results reveal that the COSCSO is strongly competitive and capable of being deployed to solve some practical problems.

Indexed as

Cauchy mutationcompetition suiteengineering optimization problemsnonlinear adaptive parameteroptimal neighborhood disturbancesand cat swarm optimization algorithm

Identifiers

PMID37218777
PMCPMC10204464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.