Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37218658›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2023

Physician Perspectives on the Food and Drug Administration's Decision to Grant Accelerated Approval to Aducanumab for Alzheimer's Disease.

Sanket S Dhruva, Aaron S Kesselheim, Steven Woloshin, Robin Z Ji, Zhigang Lu, Jonathan J Darrow, Rita F Redberg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sanket S DhruvaSection of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0674-2032
Aaron S KesselheimProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8867-2666
Steven WoloshinDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Robin Z JiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.
Zhigang LuProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jonathan J DarrowProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Rita F RedbergPhilip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice · USSan Francisco VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Improving Safety of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in VeteransIK2HX003357 · VA · VETERANS AFFAIRS MED CTR SAN FRANCISCO · PI Sanket S Dhruva · 2022 to 2026
–
HSRD VA IK2 HX003357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In June 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval to aducanumab, a monoclonal antibody indicated for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. The accelerated approval decision was controversial due to concerns about the use of an unvalidated surrogate measure, beta-amyloid, as the basis for approval and a lack of clinical outcome benefit. Between October 2021 and September 2022, we conducted a survey of a nationally representative group of internists, medical oncologists, and cardiologists to understand perspectives around aducanumab's approval and how this FDA decision may influence trust in other drugs approved through the accelerated approval program. Among 214 physician respondents familiar with the accelerated approval of aducanumab, 184 (86%) would not prescribe or recommend aducanumab. Further, 143 (67%) physicians reported losing trust in other drugs approved through the accelerated approval program due to the FDA's decision with aducanumab. As a growing number of similar novel Alzheimer's disease treatments are on the horizon, the first of which, lecanemab, already has received accelerated approval in January 2023, our survey findings provide insight into the impact of the FDA's regulatory decisions on the perspectives and prescribing behavior of physicians concerning these novel drug treatments.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseasePhysiciansAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDrug ApprovalHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationaducanumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID37218658
PMCPMC10869173
OpenAlexW4377564276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.