Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37218053›Full record

ReviewEuropean eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association2023

Improving programme-led and focused interventions for eating disorders: An experts' consensus statement-A UK perspective.

Emily Davey, Karina Allen, Sophie D Bennett, Rachel Bryant-Waugh, Tim Clarke, Zafra Cooper, Katharina Dixon-Ward, Jake Dudley, Ivan Eisler, Jess Griffiths and 14 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Participation in the New Maudsley Model Workshops is Associated With Reductions in Caregiver Burden in Eating Disorders.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Design, Implement, Sustain: Advancing Program-Led Interventions for Binge Eating, a Narrative Review.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Guided Self-Help Treatment for Children and Young People With Eating Disorders: A Proof-Of-Concept Pilot Study.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The current clinical approach to feeding and eating disorders aimed to increase personalization of management.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Emily DaveyUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5785-1533
Karina AllenSection of Eating Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2896-6459
Sophie D BennettUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Rachel Bryant-WaughDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Tim ClarkeNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Zafra CooperDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Katharina Dixon-WardBeat, Norwich, UK.
Jake DudleyUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Ivan EislerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Jess GriffithsNHS England Adult Eating Disorders Co-Chair Parliamentary Health Service Ombudsman's Delivery Group, Redditch, UK.
Andrew J HillLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Nadia MicaliUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Rebecca MurphyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ivana PicekSection of Eating Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Ros ReaBeat, Norwich, UK.
Ulrike SchmidtSection of Eating Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Mima SimicMaudsley Centre for Child and Adolescent Eating Disorders, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Kate TchanturiaSection of Eating Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8988-3265
Gemma Traviss-TurnerLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1770-6216
Janet TreasureSection of Eating Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0871-4596
Hannah TurnerEating Disorders Service, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Tracey WadeBlackbird Initiative, Flinders Research Institute for Mental Health and Wellbeing, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4402-770X
Glenn WallerClinical and Applied Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7794-9546
Roz ShafranUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/W002418/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEating disorders are associated with significant illness burden and costs, yet access to evidence-based care is limited. Greater use of programme-led and focused interventions that are less resource-intensive might be part of the solution to this demand-capacity mismatch.

methodIn October 2022, a group of predominantly UK-based clinical and academic researchers, charity representatives and people with lived experience convened to consider ways to improve access to, and efficacy of, programme-led and focused interventions for eating disorders in an attempt to bridge the demand-capacity gap.

resultsSeveral key recommendations were made across areas of research, policy, and practice. Of particular importance is the view that programme-led and focused interventions are suitable for a range of different eating disorder presentations across all ages, providing medical and psychiatric risk are closely monitored. The terminology used for these interventions should be carefully considered, so as not to imply that the treatment is suboptimal.

conclusionsProgramme-led and focused interventions are a viable option to close the demand-capacity gap for eating disorder treatment and are particularly needed for children and young people. Work is urgently needed across sectors to evaluate and implement such interventions as a clinical and research priority.

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersAdolescentChildCosts and Cost AnalysisHumansUnited Kingdomaccess to carebrief therapyeating disordersguided self-helplow intensitytreatment gap

Identifiers

PMID37218053
PMCPMC10947440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.