Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37218021›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2023

Profiling the immune epigenome across global cattle breeds.

Jessica Powell, Andrea Talenti, Andressa Fisch, Johanneke D Hemmink, Edith Paxton, Philip Toye, Isabel Santos, Beatriz R Ferreira, Tim K Connelley, Liam J Morrison and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jessica PowellThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK. jpowell2@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2474-2570
Andrea TalentiThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1309-3667
Andressa FischRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Johanneke D HemminkCentre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health, Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
Edith PaxtonThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
Philip ToyeThe International Livestock Research Institute, PO Box 30709, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
Isabel SantosRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Beatriz R FerreiraRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Tim K Connelley *The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK.
Liam J Morrison *The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK. Liam.Morrison@roslin.ed.ac.uk.
James G D Prendergast *The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK. James.Prendergast@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8916-018X

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M010996/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P024025/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/10002070Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20002172Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/30002275Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T019468/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding the variation between well and poorly adapted cattle breeds to local environments and pathogens is essential for breeding cattle with improved climate and disease-resistant phenotypes. Although considerable progress has been made towards identifying genetic differences between breeds, variation at the epigenetic and chromatin levels remains poorly characterized. Here, we generate, sequence and analyse over 150 libraries at base-pair resolution to explore the dynamics of DNA methylation and chromatin accessibility of the bovine immune system across three distinct cattle lineages.

resultsWe find extensive epigenetic divergence between the taurine and indicine cattle breeds across immune cell types, which is linked to the levels of local DNA sequence divergence between the two cattle sub-species. The unique cell type profiles enable the deconvolution of complex cellular mixtures using digital cytometry approaches. Finally, we show distinct sub-categories of CpG islands based on their chromatin and methylation profiles that discriminate between classes of distal and gene proximal islands linked to discrete transcriptional states.

conclusionsOur study provides a comprehensive resource of DNA methylation, chromatin accessibility and RNA expression profiles of three diverse cattle populations. The findings have important implications, from understanding how genetic editing across breeds, and consequently regulatory backgrounds, may have distinct impacts to designing effective cattle epigenome-wide association studies in non-European breeds.

Indexed as

ChromatinEpigenomeAnimalsCattleCpG IslandsPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideChromatinCattleChromatinDNA methylationExpressionImmune cellsSubspecies

Identifiers

PMID37218021
PMCPMC10204299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.