Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37217973›Full record

ReviewJournal of intensive care2023

Fundamental concepts and the latest evidence for esophageal pressure monitoring.

Tatsutoshi Shimatani, Miyako Kyogoku, Yukie Ito, Muneyuki Takeuchi, Robinder G Khemani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of intensive care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Estimation of Transpulmonary Driving Pressure, Strain, and Lung-Specific Elastance Using Volumetric Methods in Invasively Ventilated Children-A Feasibility Study.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Esophageal Manometry in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Necessity or Simply a Neighbor of the Pulmonary Artery Catheter?Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tatsutoshi ShimataniDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima, Japan. tatsutoc@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0148-2924
Miyako KyogokuDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, 840 Murodo-cho, Osaka, Izumi, Japan.
Yukie ItoDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, 840 Murodo-cho, Osaka, Izumi, Japan.
Muneyuki TakeuchiDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, 840 Murodo-cho, Osaka, Izumi, Japan.
Robinder G KhemaniPediatric ICU, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd., CA, Los Angeles, USA.
Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital · JPHiroshima University · JPUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London JP21K09035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transpulmonary pressure is an essential physiologic concept as it reflects the true pressure across the alveoli, and is a more precise marker for lung stress. To calculate transpulmonary pressure, one needs an estimate of both alveolar pressure and pleural pressure. Airway pressure during conditions of no flow is the most widely accepted surrogate for alveolar pressure, while esophageal pressure remains the most widely measured surrogate marker for pleural pressure. This review will cover important concepts and clinical applications for esophageal manometry, with a particular focus on how to use the information from esophageal manometry to adjust or titrate ventilator support. The most widely used method for measuring esophageal pressure uses an esophageal balloon catheter, although these measurements can be affected by the volume of air in the balloon. Therefore, when using balloon catheters, it is important to calibrate the balloon to ensure the most appropriate volume of air, and we discuss several methods which have been proposed for balloon calibration. In addition, esophageal balloon catheters only estimate the pleural pressure over a certain area within the thoracic cavity, which has resulted in a debate regarding how to interpret these measurements. We discuss both direct and elastance-based methods to estimate transpulmonary pressure, and how they may be applied for clinical practice. Finally, we discuss a number of applications for esophageal manometry and review many of the clinical studies published to date which have used esophageal pressure. These include the use of esophageal pressure to assess lung and chest wall compliance individually which can provide individualized information for patients with acute respiratory failure in terms of setting PEEP, or limiting inspiratory pressure. In addition, esophageal pressure has been used to estimate effort of breathing which has application for ventilator weaning, detection of upper airway obstruction after extubation, and detection of patient and mechanical ventilator asynchrony.

Indexed as

ARDSEsophageal pressureTranspulmonary pressureVILI

Identifiers

PMID37217973
PMCPMC10201808
OpenAlexW4377239034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.