Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37217917›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychiatry2023

Depression after stoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Joshua G Kovoor, Jonathan Henry W Jacobsen, Brandon Stretton, Stephen Bacchi, Aashray K Gupta, Brayden Claridge, Matthew V Steen, Ameya Bhanushali, Lorenz Bartholomeusz, Suzanne Edwards and 12 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Joshua G KovoorUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. joshua.kovoor@adelaide.edu.au.
Jonathan Henry W JacobsenRoyal Australasian College of Surgeons, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Brandon StrettonUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Stephen BacchiUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Aashray K GuptaUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Brayden ClaridgeThe Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Matthew V SteenGlenside Health Services, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Ameya BhanushaliUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Lorenz BartholomeuszThe Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Suzanne EdwardsUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Gayatri P AsokanFlinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Gopika AsokanUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Amanda McGeeStoma Care Services, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Christopher D OvendenUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Joseph N HewittUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Markus I TrochslerUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Robert T PadburyFlinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Seth W PerryState University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Ma-Li WongState University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Julio LicinioFlinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Guy J MaddernUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Peter J HewettUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression is the leading cause of global disability and can develop following the change in body image and functional capacity associated with stoma surgery. However, reported prevalence across the literature is unknown. Accordingly, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to characterise depressive symptoms after stoma surgery and potential predictive factors.

methodsPubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Library were searched from respective database inception to 6 March 2023 for studies reporting rates of depressive symptoms after stoma surgery. Risk of bias was assessed using the Downs and Black checklist for non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs), and Cochrane RoB2 tool for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Meta-analysis incorporated meta-regressions and a random-effects model. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42021262345.

resultsFrom 5,742 records, 68 studies were included. According to Downs and Black checklist, the 65 NRSIs were of low to moderate methodological quality. According to Cochrane RoB2, the three RCTs ranged from low risk of bias to some concerns of bias. Thirty-eight studies reported rates of depressive symptoms after stoma surgery as a proportion of the respective study populations, and from these, the median rate across all timepoints was 42.9% 42.9% (IQR: 24.2-58.9%). Pooled scores for respective validated depression measures (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)) across studies reporting those scores were below clinical thresholds for major depressive disorder according to severity criteria of the respective scores. In the three studies that used the HADS to compare non-stoma versus stoma surgical populations, depressive symptoms were 58% less frequent in non-stoma populations. Region (Asia-Pacific; Europe; Middle East/Africa; North America) was significantly associated with postoperative depressive symptoms (p = 0.002), whereas age (p = 0.592) and sex (p = 0.069) were not.

conclusionsDepressive symptoms occur in almost half of stoma surgery patients, which is higher than the general population, and many inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer populations outlined in the literature. However, validated measures suggest this is mostly at a level of clinical severity below major depressive disorder. Stoma patient outcomes and postoperative psychosocial adjustment may be enhanced by increased psychological evaluation and care in the perioperative period.

Indexed as

DepressionMajor Depressive DisorderAnxietyAnxiety DisordersHumansQuality of LifeDepressionMoodNursesPatientsStoma surgery

Identifiers

PMID37217917
PMCPMC10201486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.