Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37217911›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2023

Influence of buccal and palatal bone thickness on post-surgical marginal bone changes around implants placed in posterior maxilla: a multi-centre prospective study.

Marco Cicciù, Umberto Pratella, Luca Fiorillo, Fabio Bernardello, Francesco Perillo, Antonio Rapani, Claudio Stacchi, Teresa Lombardi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05632172 (Influence of Buccal and Palatal Bone Thickness on Post-surgical Marginal Bone Changes Around Implants Placed in Posterior Maxilla), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05632172 completednot on this map

Influence of Buccal and Palatal Bone Thickness on Post-surgical Marginal Bone Changes Around Implants Placed in Posterior Maxilla

TypeobservationalSponsorInternational Piezosurgery AcademyRan2021 to 2021Enrolled90ConditionsBone Implant, ComplicationsArmsimplant insertion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Gender-Based Variation in Alveolar Bone Thickness of Maxillary Incisor Teeth: A CBCT Retrospective Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco CicciùSchool of Dentistry, Department of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, 95124, Italy.
Umberto PratellaPrivate Practice, Bologna, 40138, Italy.
Luca FiorilloSchool of Dentistry, Department of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, 95124, Italy.
Fabio BernardelloPrivate Practice, Terranegra di Legnago (VR), Legnago, 37045, Italy.
Francesco PerilloPrivate Practice, Naples, 80121, Italy.
Antonio RapaniDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, 34125, Italy. rapani.antonio@gmail.com.
Claudio StacchiDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, 34125, Italy.
Teresa LombardiDepartment of Health Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, 88100, Italy.
University of Trieste · ITAlbanian University · ALIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro · ITIter · ITMagna Graecia University · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Catania · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous clinical variables may influence early marginal bone loss (EMBL), including surgical, prosthetic and host-related factors. Among them, bone crest width plays a crucial role: an adequate peri-implant bone envelope has a protective effect against the influence of the aforementioned factors on marginal bone stability. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of buccal and palatal bone thickness at the time of implant placement on EMBL during the submerged healing period.

methodsPatients presenting a single edentulism in the upper premolar area and requiring implant-supported rehabilitation were enrolled following inclusion and exclusion criteria. Internal connection implants (Twinfit, Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany) were inserted after piezoelectric implant site preparation. Mid-facial and mid-palatal thickness and height of the peri-implant bone were measured immediately after implant placement (T0) with a periodontal probe and recorded to the nearest 0.5 mm. After 3 months of submerged healing (T1), implants were uncovered and measurements were repeated with the same protocol. Kruskal-Wallis test for independent samples was used to compare bone changes from T0 to T1. Multivariate linear regression models were built to assess the influence of different variables on buccal and palatal EMBL.

resultsNinety patients (50 females, 40 males, mean age 42.9 ± 15.1 years), treated with the insertion of 90 implants in maxillary premolar area, were included in the final analysis. Mean buccal and palatal bone thickness at T0 were 2.42 ± 0.64 mm and 1.31 ± 0.38 mm, respectively. Mean buccal and palatal bone thickness at T1 were 1.92 ± 0.71 mm and 0.87 ± 0.49 mm, respectively. Changes in both buccal and palatal thickness from T0 to T1 resulted statistically significant (p = 0.000). Changes in vertical bone levels from T0 to T1 resulted not significant both on buccal (mean vertical resorption 0.04 ± 0.14 mm; p = 0.479) and palatal side (mean vertical resorption 0.03 ± 0.11 mm; p = 0.737). Multivariate linear regression analysis showed a significant negative correlation between vertical bone resorption and bone thickness at T0 on both buccal and palatal side.

conclusionThe present findings suggest that a bone envelope > 2 mm on the buccal side and > 1 mm on the palatal side may effectively prevent peri-implant vertical bone resorption following surgical trauma.

trial registrationThe present study was retrospectively recorded in a public register of clinical trials ( www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov - NCT05632172) on 30/11/2022.

Indexed as

Bone ResorptionDental ImplantsAdultDental Implantation, EndosseousFemaleHumansMaleMaxillaMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesDental ImplantsBone remodelingBone tissueDental implantMaxillary bonePiezosurgerySocket preservation

Identifiers

PMID37217911
PMCPMC10204312
OpenAlexW4377289391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.